2006-09-11 10:14:22 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Untill Halliburton say "no more money here" we leave Iraq
2006-09-11 10:22:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The exact same plan with Western Germany after WWII. Support and stabilize the new government until it can support and protect itself. It took about 60 years, but we did protect them from the soviets. I doubt Iraq will take quite that long, but it might. I wonder if we ask Germany, if they will say it was a waste to spend all that money on them for all those years?
Open a history book. Get over your blind, irrational hatred of one man. Maybe then you'll see reality for what it is, instead of what you want it to be.
"Hate leads to the dark side" - Yoda.
If a green muppet can figure it out, why can't you?
2006-09-11 17:20:59 · answer #2 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
When the US invaded Iraq I knew they would try to get a nice civil war going to have an excuse to stay indefinitely. I was only astonished it took them that long.
Face it, you've got a president who's piling debt upon debt on the country while he and his chums are fattening their private bank accounts.
2006-09-11 17:28:29 · answer #3 · answered by haggesitze 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You're talking as though Iraq's the problem here.
2006-09-11 17:16:46 · answer #4 · answered by reigning queen 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I wish we could get the hell out of there. As long as Bush is still in presidency the "plan" the government has to get our troops out is guaranteed not to progress.
2006-09-11 17:22:12 · answer #5 · answered by forrest_rain 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is the catche-22 here bush_kills_4_god! It is like holding tight the tail of a tiger!
2006-09-11 17:26:10 · answer #6 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What do you mean, we can't leave? Of course we can leave, it's just the opposite of going.
2006-09-11 17:20:29 · answer #7 · answered by bubu 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋