2006-09-11 10:12:59 · 11 answers · asked by Red Sawx ® 6 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
It's 50-50. The Pats lost a good wideout, but the Hawks have a big problem. Too many recievers and a MVP runningback. Complaints about not getting the ball enough should start around week 6. Pats will find a way to win. They still have Troy Brown and he always finds a way to get in a game.
2006-09-11 14:52:16 · answer #1 · answered by Mike 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Makes sense. As a Pats fan, I wish they could've reached an agreement with such a good receiver, but since it was obvious that wasn't going to happen, at least they'll get something out of it and both sides can move on without the distractions.
2006-09-11 12:08:24 · answer #2 · answered by bradp521 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends what the Pats got. It is really good for the Seahawks though.
2006-09-11 10:29:19 · answer #3 · answered by cheesehead 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Patriots fail at life.
2006-09-11 11:06:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think the Patriots could not really afford to lose another key player.
2006-09-11 10:49:23 · answer #5 · answered by TK 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good move for the seahawks Wide Receiver are spoil children
2006-09-11 10:24:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its a sign of the coming Apocalypse
2006-09-11 10:19:30 · answer #7 · answered by phoephus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it just proves the stupidity of anything patriots
2006-09-11 11:06:23 · answer #8 · answered by Shorty 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
good move for the hawks...bad move for the pats
2006-09-11 10:29:23 · answer #9 · answered by Voicekiller 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
love it, love the hawks, they were robbed, but they're gonna win it all this year
2006-09-11 10:16:20 · answer #10 · answered by C_Millionaire 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋