Did George W. need a war to make his Presidency a success or R we fighting the bad guys but lossing tons of young men and women?
2006-09-11 09:51:05 · 8 answers · asked by Lovely B 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
first: it was WMD, then they admitted that Iraq didn't have any WMD.
second: bringing freedom to iraqis, now all iraqis are killing each other.(thanks for that freedom).
third:fighting terror & insurgents,........!! fight them in Iraq? why??? get your soldeirs killed thousands of miles a way from their homes? does it worth..
now what??? who knows , may be the guys in the white house now are preparing another fake reason to give to the public, they can do this , but can they get back those dead men again to their families?
have you seen the movie "WAG THE DOG" for Dustin Hoffman, or "Fahrenhiet 11" for michael moore... may be you can find some answers to all you question
2006-09-11 10:15:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the beginning was to finish something his father started years before. I think we needed to be there for a little while but instead of taking over all the security we shoudl've taught the Iraqi's how to defend thier people and got our men & women out of there a long time ago. I think we need to be in the middle east to a point to seek out the terrorists groups but I dont think we need all those troops over there.
2006-09-11 09:55:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You are fighting for the bad guys Not the American public that in majority is against Bush & Saudi Arabia's oil war!
2006-09-11 10:14:17 · answer #3 · answered by bulabate 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hell no we shouldn't be at war!!! It's definitely not worth it. We're supposed to be fighting to stop terrorism but what about the fight to stop things that are going on in our own country?! Hunger, murders, illnesses... those are more important...
I definitely support it and the troops that are going over there, i know quite a few people that have had to go over there and are still there...
2006-09-11 09:59:10 · answer #4 · answered by cali_gal716 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's kind of academic, now. They're there. Doubtful they're coming out of there right away, too.
2006-09-11 09:57:49 · answer #5 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wars happen when diplomacy fails. It depends on who you think caused diplomacy to fail.
2006-09-11 09:54:51 · answer #6 · answered by Brand X 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
fight it there or here? let them breed and train there to bring it here? Some of this was indeed done the wrong way.
2006-09-11 09:55:05 · answer #7 · answered by ronnny 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This question is already on my list of over-beaten questions. What answer do you expect to hear that you haven't heard already?
And you already have your own answer, so why did you ask it?
2006-09-11 09:55:19 · answer #8 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋