has your viewpoint of Bush changed on the 5th Anniversary of 911??

Answer 1

Yes it has. I once thought he was just dumb, now I think he is pure evil. Here is why:

My research has taken me back thousands of years. It is so bizarre, that I hesitate to write it. Hang on to your sox, because you are going to journey into the world where mysticism, religion, Satanism, spirituality and quantum physics meet. No, it's no joke, read on.

I'll start with the "election" of President G.W. Bush a "Skull and Bones" man. Once in office, he brought in an incompetent, but loyal to him team: they labeled themselves, the New Conservatives (Neo-Cons). With the help of other friends, that were already in place, planned the invasion of Iraq. This plan included the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq: Like another Pearl Harbor. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

Now, I could stop here, but allow me to outline and point out some interesting web sights that I have found. These will help guide you to an understanding of the events that have occurred and the ones that are probably to come.

I. What is this secret society called the "Skull and Bones"?
It's a group a satanic worshipers, whose members include G.W. Bush, his father G. H. Bush, his grandfather Prescott Bush and John Kerry. See list of members:
http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/3/skullroster.htm

2.What is the "Skull and Bones" agenda ?
It's the "New World Order", "World Domination", "Globalization", and "World Slavery" all wrapped up into one.
http://www.answers.com/topic/skull-and-bones
http://tvnewslies.org/html/terrorism__globalism_and_consp.html

3. Has any "Skull and Bones" member ever tried to force their agenda, on the U.S.A.
Yes, Prescott Bush (G.W. Bush's grandfather) attempted to assasinate FDR and install Hitler's Nazi model to impose Marshal Law, on the United States.
http://iwilltryit.com/bushnazi1.htm
http://digital-falcon.com/pipermail/toxickemail_digital-falcon.com/2005-September/000497.html

4. Where did the "Skull and Bones" secret society originate from ?
It's believed to be an offshoot of the "Thule Society"; a secret Satanic group from Germany of which Hitler was a member of.
http://www.threeworldwars.com/world-war-2/adolf-hitler.htm

5. Finally, where did all this secret Satanic stuff come from and what is the originators long long term goal ?
This is where it gets too bizarre, I will give you a link, that seems to explain it best. It's crazy, but remember, science is now in the process of accepting a multidimensional universe. If nothing else, enjoy a good read.
http://www.illuminati-news.com/000-spiritual/html/how-to-fight-the-nwo.html

Answer 2

What's to change? One man cannot satisfy the yearning and fickle whim of 300 million people, all with their own personal agendas, opinions and commitments.

On September 11, 2001, the U.S. was attacked by homicidal warriors of a stateless organization seeking to unravel western civilization to its core.

Since then, the Taliban have lost power in Afghanistan and are heaving the desperate last gasps of an illegitimate regime. Democratic momentum has taken root in Iraq. The world has recognized the dire need of international involvement and management of the terrorist elements and their sponsors in the Middle East, even if the world has not come to the realization that Israel is not the agitator here. Al-Qaeda leadership and operatives are chatting like canaries and will be prosecuted before a formal trial, as is Saddam Hussein. Though Iran and N. Korea are boisterous about nuclear ambitions, one is clearly faced with a permanent U.S. military presence on its border and the other is starving to death.

I'd say NONE of this was done or could be undone by Bush alone. There are things you are able to do and are unable to do, as a result of timing, participation and level of effort. These things have fluctuated greatly among the Western allies for the last five years. Spain caved into terrorists and elected a spineless PM to deflect Muslim outrage. France cracked down on Muslim unrest and then quickly backtracked and fired the one person who brought peace to that nation. The UK continues to appease the Muslim community which continues to birth radical youths who have no interest in the future of the UK or life in general. Qaddafi relinquishes his nuclear programs and is suddenly almost a darling of the Western allies for his willingness to make peace not war. India and Pakistan, despite their tumultuous history and recent headbutting, are having diplomatic exchanges as equals. Even Russia and China are talking (which can be good or bad, depending on your perspective).

So the world never hinges on the acts of one person alone, but more on the collective will of people to live in peace or live at war. The West abhors conflict, the EU in particular, yet America is chastised for defending itself and attempting to enforce some kind of change in a region that had been permanently stuck in some long forgotten century.

We didn't elect the best and brightest to run our government, and unfortunately there are no easy answers when at war with an ideaology vs. a cohesive and organized state. That being said, we have 2 years to come up with some agendas, execution plans and new leadership to move ourselves out of a war footing and on to a productive era of American history.

Let's remember how long the world wars of the 20th century were fought and what little truly resulted from them and how many lost their lives in valor and in shame. This period's conflicts pale in comparison, and if we are able to bring popular represenation to the part of the world living in the darkness of ignorance and despots, then it is a worthy call, and one answered by America alone, regardless of who is purportedly calling the shots.

Answer 3

Actually, I didn't think too highly of him during the campaign or prior to 9/11 (but he was light years better than AlGork). It was after 9/11 where I saw that he was actually a good and steadfast leader who could guide us through these troubled times.

I still disagree with a fair amount of his 'compassionate' (i.e. liberal) ideas, but have supported his WoT efforts.

Answer 4

NO that would be a very uneducated reason to change my viewpoint of Bush!

Answer 5

I supported him in 2000 when I voted for him, I supported him when he made difficult decisions following 9/11, I supported him when I voted for him in 2004 and I support him now. Nope, no change.

Answer 6

My opinion of bush hasn't changed since I first saw his daddy on TV.
Bush is the voo doo man.

Answer 7

I like that he fought the Taliban. Unfortunately, he didn't finish that fight. Now we are throwing away billions of $$$ into Iraq. I just wish he'd secure the American borders already.

Answer 8

Nope he's still the loveable idiot in control of the most powerful nation in the world that we all admire.

Answer 9

Why would the date change any ones opinion? Wither you like him or hate him, today's date won't make any difference.

Answer 10

y would it change??
it might have made me hate him a little bit more