English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is a question for the less than bright democrats that all you hear come out of thier mouth is doom and gloom. This George W. is so bad? He is just busy cleaning up Clintons mess because Bill was too much of a pussy to stand up to anyone but never had a problem giving others the tools to make this country less safe!! I.E NORTH KOREA

2006-09-11 09:07:10 · 5 answers · asked by airgame12 2 in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

A prime example of that is Cindy Sheehan ..
There is overwhelming evidence that "W" was left to clean up after the Clinton administration . The drive-by media never before lost credibility as much as they did when they began the political agenda of the far left after 9/11 .

2006-09-11 09:37:08 · answer #1 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0 0

That will be learned about the same time cons learn that Rush Limbaugh and all of conservative talk radio is full of b.s. Cons believe others are weak-minded but casually look the other way when Limbaugh goes to the Dominican Republic (well known for its sex trade) toting a bottle full of viagra and then refuses to answer questions about his trip. I thought the cons represented personal responsibility and family values? Where are the family values in that little episode? Furthermore, they refuse to criticize other 'family values' conservatives like Randall 'Duke' Cuntingham and Republican cronies like Jack Abrahmoff. Talk about people in glass houses! Irregardless if you think Clinton is responsible for terrorism, the fact remains that Bush invaded Iraq on false pretenses (i.e. he lied). By the way, where are those WMD's??? Conservatives conveniently overlook the fact that a bi-partisan congressional panel just released a report saying what Dems have been saying all along, "THERE IS NO LINK BETWEEN IRAQ AND AL-QAEDA!" But the 'weak-minded' kool-aid drinkers that grovel behind the GOP don't accept this (it is against their programming). Instead, they choose to believe invading a country that saw Al-Qaeda as a threat was a good move. Hussein being out of power may be a good thing, but it has nothing to do with terrorism. He had no WMD's and was boxed in and out of commission. If anything, the Bush administration has made more enemies in the Middle East by creating chaos in that region. Among the number of people that have died because of the war, surely there will be orphans and survivors that will desire revenge. In other words, the Bush administration probably made MORE terrorists not less. Not only did they not have to invade Iraq to fight terrorism, they botched the job as well and now we have a mess on our hands. You mention North Korea. Had the U.S. not invaded Iraq, we would have the military forces available to deal with other threats like Iran and North Korea. We are powerless to stop them. Now that Bush has tied our hands and committed our forces, you think we are safer, yet, North Korea and Iran just laugh at us while they continue to make nuclear weapons! Bush invades the one country that had absolutely no WMD's and ignores the other two that DO have them and you think this is smart???? Weak-minded, indeed. Furthermore, Republicans were supposed to be the party of 'small government' and 'less taxes', yet the deficit is spiraling out of control, the Iraq war is going to cost half a TRILLION dollars by 2010 (Dick Cheney's own words) and more than half of the average Americans don't have healthcare. Meanwhile, Republicans build billion-dollar bridges to nowhere and break all sorts of records for government earmarks and pork barrel projects. They have made a mess of the economy, the Iraq war, and everything else they touch yet you continue to support them. Weak-minded my *ss.

2006-09-11 16:36:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You're an idiot.

It sounds like you're controlled by the media.

Turn off the TV. Read a book instead of the newspaper. Play a CD instead of talk radio.

There's a real word out there, and it's waiting for you. Problem is that, as of right now, you're not invited.

"Intelligence is the capacity to posses opposing thought"

Good luck Airhead12; it's going to take years of effort to straighten you out, but it will be worth it, if you're smart enough to try.

2006-09-11 16:15:16 · answer #3 · answered by Askin 1 · 0 1

If Clinton had left a mess (and I don't agree that he did), George Bush has had 6 years to make an even worse mess.

2006-09-11 16:21:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

the media does not control me. does that mean i am
strong minded or that i choose to use whatever brain
power i have? no i am not a democrat bright or otherwise
neither am i a republican. next sentence is GB so bad?
well, he may be just a well meaning bumbler, but i seem
to detect in him a tendency to think he knows what is
best for everyone and to think he should shove his
vision down our throats whether we want it or not. as
for Clinton the less said the better. he just had a bad
habit of keeping whatever brains he had in his trousers.
anything else you want to vent about?

2006-09-11 16:20:34 · answer #5 · answered by agedlioness 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers