I mean, we already murder babies by the millions anyway.....think of the food resource we are just tossing away after we carve open the skull to colapse it, then vaccum out the remains. It could be the next caviar.
I mean, liberals love to kill babies, so we might as well maximize the resource....they are not human afterall, right?
2006-09-11
08:12:01
·
20 answers
·
asked by
lundstroms2004
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Allie is an idiot for two reasons.
First, fetus is Latin for baby. I cannot believe the collective ignorance of the left. Second, if we accept that babies are ok to kill or terminate via abortion, then why not eat them. she dodged the question.
2006-09-11
08:17:12 ·
update #1
So rather than face the query hmm?, again you show just how uncomfortable abortion is to human nature. I mean, c'mon, the founder of Planned Parenthood, Ms. Sanger, was anti-abortion.
2006-09-11
08:20:31 ·
update #2
dukalink is getting it. Any act of dehuminization itself reduced the shell of a human life to nothing but its resource value. The problem with his reasoning is that reps. still see soldiers as people...maybe his arguement would be better placed if he substituted towle heads for soldiers.
2006-09-11
08:23:22 ·
update #3
So the best thing that people can do is to throw insults and not pierce the relvevence of the question. If we accept the premise that babies are OK to abort, not defined as human life, and therefore not subject to the moral difficulties of ending their potential lives, then does that not mean that they shold not be reduced to their value for research, or food, ormake-up, or some other resource?
I would really like liberals to be consistent on this. If babies are not human, then why not use their aborted remains for materials in the marketplace?
But liberals attack when confronted with their own twisted logic.
2006-09-11
08:26:58 ·
update #4
So to understand myridions arguement, to be consistant, we need to execute the old people who drain our resources as well, and the retards, and the handicapped.......the problem with this is that Carnegie was a street urchin orphan who becamse fabously wealthy......so the whole orpahns who will drain is bs.....we can always use street sweepers.
2006-09-11
08:29:13 ·
update #5
I have no objection to the mornig after pill...the bloody pool left in the toilet can be added to red paint, much like ox blood, to thicken it and make it more vibrant.
As far as bigger families go....so what. there is nothing wrong with having a bigger family, or a small family, or no family as well....your counter point is moot.
2006-09-11
08:31:31 ·
update #6
I do not know what they taste like....that is why I said if...for all I know they taste like bison, or tiger, or fish, or veal (milk fed baby...yummy). All I am saying is if the babies are not people, then why not maximize the resource of the discarded flesh?
2006-09-11
08:33:18 ·
update #7
GOOD QUESTION!
There is big money in killing babies.
Lots of people and organizations are making a career out of abortion, and making very good money.
May not be nice, but it's the law.
2006-09-11 08:17:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why don't you just approve the morning after pill? Better yet. Let's not use condoms. It wouldn't be so bad. I only have one shitty brother. I could have had like 10 or 11 brothers and sisters, lol. Be kinda fun. Stop your whiny people and lets have bigger families??? I'll have to get a bigger car, lol
2006-09-11 15:28:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rockford 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt seriously if you will get many responses to your query. You are obviously a very disturbed person. The next time you eat chicken, pretend that is human baby and you may actually realize how much help you need.
2006-09-11 15:34:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Stephen J 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I don't eat chicken since I'm a vegetarian, so I'm guessing that would exclude human babies from my diet too. But regardless of all that, the best conclusion that I can come to is that you are an idiot. If you're actually just a moron and not an idiot, I apologize. =)
2006-09-11 15:23:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ricardo P 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hey, not a bad idea!!
I have eight backyard chickens with souls and personalities (more than can be said for fetuses). I used to eat chicken-- it's delicious-- but now I can't.
We already murder babies by the millions, hey? Oh, right, that's what the planet needs, millions of unwanted babies, possibly screwed up by mothers who drank, smoked whatever, etc. The health care system needs those babies, too. And while we're at it, let's deliver them to your door to feed, care for and educate. Are you ready?
2006-09-11 15:24:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by myrmidon 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
How would we know what they taste like? You say liberals like to kill babies, so you're not a liberal, so youre a conservative and you came up with this idea, so liberals like to kill babies and conservatives like to eat them right.
2006-09-11 15:27:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Fiesty Redhead 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mmmmmm..... babies.
I prefer mine with pasta, under an alfredo sauce. Generally, white wine goes better with babies.
Bon apetit!
2006-09-11 15:33:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by J.J. 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
And the GOP eats the hearts out of soldiers, as they are not human either, right? The GOP loves to see dead soldiers so much, they won't let the rest of us see the pictures of the coffins coming off the planes.
2006-09-11 15:16:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Maybe it's like this... We'd might just eat more baby chickens!
2006-09-11 15:17:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by RhinoBoy 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
are u on drugs or something.what made u think of this question?ur sick.are u a liberal?
2006-09-11 15:17:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by sexychick 1
·
1⤊
0⤋