English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Check out this google video and post your options below, Thanks.

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4232897377629019446&q=holographic+universe

2006-09-11 07:59:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Biology

Sorry aboy spelling its ment to be about*

2006-09-11 08:01:21 · update #1

9 answers

Will let you know when the damn thing loads up.........

Right. Loaded and checked.

Whatever you want to call it.... Allah, God, Jehovah, Satan, Mother Nature, Quantum Physics, Biology. All it really is... is "the way things are".

This video seeks to make a philosophical distinction between the internal impression and the external sense. As both are inextricably linked, to seperate the two is fundamentally stupid and flawed.

Secondly, it mentions that science is "becoming aware" of the limitations of the human senses.... yes, science finds it very difficult to see distant galaxies with the naked eye, or measure the temperature of a nuclear reactor by placing your hand in it. However, for operating machines to do the above, it is totally fine.

These are just two of the ways in which this video attempts to warp both science and philosophy to support religion.

Don't get dragged into an endless naval-gazing exercise that validates the huge leap of blind faith and scripture quoting that fundamentally underpins this video.

Don't be a sheep.

2006-09-11 08:13:35 · answer #1 · answered by Rich N 3 · 0 0

I would have been more impressed if the film had actual scientists (like Stephen Hawking) speaking about metaphysics and the holographic universe. In actuality, the holographic universe is only a theory, just as universal mind is still a theory. The only way a person would know for sure is to meditate and take their own inner journey to see what is beyond the physical, and even then their perception would be subjective.

Another fact is that science has not yet proven the existence of the soul. There is a great deal of anecdotal information out there about people's out-of-body, near death, and remote viewing experiences, but these are under scientific study and have not been proven yet. I have personally had an "out of body" experience. Can I prove it? No. Do I believe it happened to me? Yes. There is evidence that they are indeed functions of the brain, but there is nothing that scientifically connects these experiences with allah.

I believe that Jesus came to teach us that in order to become one with God we must perfect ourselves by following Jesus' example. Apparently Jesus understood scientific principles of cause and effect and matter on this planet, because there are numerous references in the New Testament about his performing miracles: raising people from the dead, creating food, healing the sick, walking on water, and disappearing in a crowd.

For someone to be brainwashed by this sort of unscientific film is pitiful. The word metaphysics simply means "beyond physics" or "beyond the physical." My deep belief in God and Jesus teachings can be called metaphysical too because spiritual and philosophical concepts are "beyond the physical."

To assume that allah has greater knowledge than God is a leap. Satan can tell you the same things allah does and be convincing. Interesting they didn't refer to "killing the infidels" in the film.

Another interesting thing was at the end of the film when allah speaks of himself as "we." The bible also refers to plural God(s) in Genesis. I would recommend that you read Zacharia Sitchin's "The Twelfth Planet" and his other books where he talks about the ancient Sumerian records (the oldest records known to exist) and their documentation of a superior race. These "Gods" were not beneficial to early humans, but enslaved them.

What do I think about the film? It is obvious Islam propaganda in order to convince poor unsuspecting souls that allah is the one true Creator! If all we perceive is an illusion, it stands to reason that allah is also an illusion!

2006-09-17 19:33:07 · answer #2 · answered by LadyLgl 3 · 0 0

Some very nice pictures and good graphics.

It was interesting to watch but shall we say the logic left a bit to be desired. OK, you would expect some gaps in a short film but internal inconsistencies cannot be excused.

2006-09-11 08:47:04 · answer #3 · answered by tringyokel 6 · 0 0

YAWN!!!!!

the first 10 seconds bored the crap out of me so i turned it off and after reading some of the other peolpes comments on here im glad i did.

2006-09-17 10:14:54 · answer #4 · answered by vish 2 · 0 0

The Matrix has you Neo.

I cant believe i wasted 24 minutes watching that. that is 24 minutes i will never get back.

2006-09-11 08:21:18 · answer #5 · answered by bretttwarwick 3 · 0 0

for the first 15 min i thought it made some sense. but when he started chatting abt Allah the only absolute being who is the creator blah blah.....blah... tht made no sense at all. if He created everthing then who come only one person realised tht He is the creator and not all of us know tht.... over my head man....

2006-09-11 23:16:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sounds like David Icke bullshit to me.

2006-09-11 08:05:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Cheers everyone read your answers so never bothered to look.

2006-09-17 02:52:18 · answer #8 · answered by Ollie 7 · 0 0

it was very long and i have a short attention span

sorry :p

2006-09-17 11:50:18 · answer #9 · answered by PhotoBear2 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers