I think it is a possibility. I don't like to get caught up in conspiracy theories, thats why I say it is a possibility. I have seen the evidence and it is about as shaky as the evidence that it happened they way it said it did. My husband speaks Arabic and the tapes that they played on TV and the way they translated it he said was not the same. Now before I get all kinds of hate mail, I am not condoning what happened and am sad that it did. And yes I do speak up against those who did it. I just say it is a possibility that some of what these conspiracy stories say may have some truth to them, or the could be what they are called just conspiracy theories.
2006-09-11 08:04:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Umm Ali 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trust me I know where you are going with this. I kinda believe the govt didnt do it, but they knew bout it and could have stopped it. But then no one would have profitted. I saw a similar thing on the net about this. The evidence that caught my attention was that the tapes, that "supposedly" show the plane hitting the pentegon, were never released. There was an interview with a man who ownes the gas station right across from where the pentagon was hit and his outside security cams were aimed right at that spot. Within minutes of the "attack" he said the FBI was at his station confescating the tapes. Also there are several Hotels in that area that have roof top cams whose tapes were taken as well.
Another interesting thing was that the side the plane hit was already being worked on. Also for the plane to hit that side of the pentagon it would have had to fly over the major highway next to it. No eyewitnesses said they saw a low flying planes over the highway. Also the pentagon is in restricted airspace. Howscome F-16 werent scrambled from Andrews air base. Makes you think
2006-09-11 08:09:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by mcskillins 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone who is technically advanced in computers, can take any movie and add anything they want. To make it appear to be something other than what it really is. Then concoct any kind of story to present, to have those with susceptible minds, to accept it as a truth. Too many fall prey to many things, which are essentially totally false or half truths.
At this point, anyone who hates Bush will try any dirty trick to attempt to make him look bad.. It is rampant!! Those who are unable to think for themselves fall prey to all the propaganda that has been presented. Forgoing the fact that all of the senators presently making so much noise, were drawing the same conclusions as Bush did.
Yet for political reasons have changed their mind and are against the very things they were for, just a few years ago. At the same time refuse to withhold financing the war.
Rather strange stance for them to have, when they have total control of the monies spent.
2006-09-11 08:06:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by mrcricket1932 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
well don't let that movie speak for you entirely on what you think but a little common sense will tell you something.
just look at how the towers went down and review the video of the pentagon before it collapsed.
and the grounds around the pentagon. (check out the video "in plane sight" also)
whatever happened it wasn't made clear for one thing.. but what do you expect?
i love to see the surveillance cameras at least on the local business and highway for that day.... i'm still waiting.
everyone near the area said... "what jet?" i was on columbia pike at the time... "ditto"
and no jet takes down no building with an inner core let alone a building without one. most the fuel went like a pimple in a flame out when the jets at the WTC hit. anyone who thinks those jets took the WTC down should get an education.
2006-09-11 08:00:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
How have Christians indignant atheists? have you ever heard approximately inquisitions, witch hunts, torture, burning on the stake, non secular wars, shunning, and demonization? You declare that Christianity is approximately love. historical past demonstrates the choice. How might you sense if the money had "In Odin we believe" revealed on it, and the pledge risk-free "One u . s . a . decrease than Odin"? does not that merely look stupid? What if the motto have been replaced to "In Allah we believe"? does not that be offensive? Why ought to those records point out something approximately faith in any respect? do you'll have your ideals bolstered each and every time you purchase something? Atheists usually are not given the comparable rights and opportunities as Christians. In some states, an atheist won't be in a position to hold place of work or testify in courtroom. we are greater probable to be denied custody of youngsters. Many municipalities enable Christian non secular reflects on public sources, yet do not enable reflects by ability of atheist communities. we don't have "In reason we believe" on the money. Your argument approximately Christians being interior the popular public is unsuitable. In a constitutional democracy, the rights of human beings are risk-free by ability of the form and its amendments. you won't be in a position to legally deny human beings's rights merely via fact they're contributors of a minority group. that includes the ultimate to freedom from faith besides as freedom of religion. via fact the yankee shape quite prohibits regulations establishing faith, merchandising it on expert records which incorporate pledges of allegiance and legal gentle is unconstitutional.
2016-10-14 21:28:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't doubt it... It sad to say, but our government is sneaky as hell, and will do anything to get ahead... Bin Laden financed the terrorists who plotted the 9/11 attacks, and george bush senior was really close to the royal family in Saudi Arabia, where Bin lAden is from... So... go figure....
2006-09-11 08:04:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by qbanita0113 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that we don't know everything there is to know about the incident and that their is a bunch of government cover up. However, I do believe the WTC were attacked by hijacked planes, but the pentagon was a load of crap.
2006-09-11 08:01:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by T J 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Plenty of people would say your crazy, but who can we trust nowadays? For sure Bin Laden was behind the whole terrorist attack, but weren't Bin Laden's family and Bush good friends at one time, due to their oil business? Hhmmm! Trust no one!
2006-09-11 08:08:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mimi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
look a government cannot be dumb to throw in three boeing-767's into two tall buildings so there has to be a valid reason for a conspiracy so i believe it was a terrorist attack
2006-09-11 08:05:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by akieboy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Check this out: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html
"Loose Change" distorts the facts, and sometimes outright lies, and the above link proves it. Yes, it was a conspiracy - by Al Queda!!!
2006-09-11 08:00:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Paul H 6
·
2⤊
1⤋