RAIDERS OR CHARGERS?
VIKINGS OR REDSKINS?
I SAY RAIDERS AND VIKINGS.
2006-09-11 06:29:36 · 6 answers · asked by JUST ME 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Skins and Raiders...
Branch is going to a be a great addition to a Seattle offense that will utilize him much more than he was in N.E. First rounder is a steep price, but thats what the market will bear.
2006-09-11 07:01:24 · answer #1 · answered by ii7-V7 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chargers- Tomlinson is best all-around back in NFL
Redskins- Defense will win this one and home field
Branch will fit in nicely to this offense as injury riddled Darrell Jackson is on his last leg. #1 draft pick was costly but immediate impact is what Seattle is looking for to make it to the big dance.
I'm more worried about the offensive line for Seattle with the loss of Hutchinson and lack of depth. Five sacks of Hasselbeck and no holes for Alexander to run through were great concerns for Seahawk fans.
2006-09-11 07:20:33 · answer #2 · answered by Kamikazeâ?ºKid 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chargers - Vikings.
Branch isn't gonna be worthy of the trade - he didn't even have a preseason. Not a well thought of trade. Seattle has made a "costly" mistake. They won't even return to the Superbowl this season.
Oh - well - the Madden curse now resides in Seattle.
Thank you, John!
Yes!!!!!!!!
2006-09-11 06:36:25 · answer #3 · answered by Nije L 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chargers and Redskins
Deion will make an impact, but a first round pick is a costly move for Seattle. Pats have no receivers left. I am not sure what they are going to do...
2006-09-11 06:51:13 · answer #4 · answered by shoelace 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
when did this happen holy crap bye the way the CHARGERS AND REDSKINS WILL WIN
2006-09-11 06:38:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
SD and MIN
2006-09-11 06:36:45 · answer #6 · answered by mikep426 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋