2006-09-11 05:44:11 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Because ESPN couldn't get Pete Carroll's dick out of their mouth long enough to say much of anything about LSU.
2006-09-11 05:53:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because they did not win anything in 2004. LSU got killed by my Georgia Bulldogs 45-13 in Athens. Later LSU lost to Auburn.
Auburn went 14-0 in 2004 and they were the SEC Champions. However, they did not make the BCS championship game. OU and USC played with for the BCS title.
LSU won the BCS title game that followed the 2003 season.
2006-09-11 18:19:31 · answer #2 · answered by sean_fagan_1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They were co-champions with USC. LSU won the BCS championship by beating Oklahoma in the BCS title game (Sugar Bowl) thereby automatically getting the championship of the ESPN (coaches) poll, but USC was voted #1 by the media poll (AP)
2006-09-11 13:28:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The BCS, overrated Oklahoma. LSU could have beaten USC.
2006-09-11 12:49:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That bugs me too. They won the BCS, but everyone on TV and radio refers to USC as champions from that year. Freakin double standards.
2006-09-11 12:50:36 · answer #5 · answered by Johnny 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They were - they won the BCS championship.
2006-09-11 12:49:29 · answer #6 · answered by Brian L 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They were the champions. FUSC
2006-09-11 12:49:53 · answer #7 · answered by bsantezee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋