No. Any safety is despite him, not because of him. Considering that this administration has systematically attacked all the "freedoms" that the hijackers supposedly just couldn't stand, I feel like we're trading too much. I think GWB likes to keep us scared. NYC and DC, the places most affected by 9/11, voted for Kerry in 2004--isn't that interesting?
It's also interesting that the trail to find OBL is completely cold.
2006-09-11 05:14:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by GreenEyedLilo 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
no one is acquainted with what percentage terrorists basically walk by the borders. they're huge open and performance been in view that 1776. As you know, the leaders of Germany and France have suggested that multi-culturalism is not any sturdy. Multi-culturalism is the HIV of western society. The Quran teaches that those who do no longer favor to hitch Islam might want to be slain. how will you're taking in those who favor to emphasise their faith on you or homicide you--you may't and we'd want to close the door on Islamic immigrants. France is a demise united states and could quickly be Islamic. we are headed down ourselves.
2016-11-26 01:10:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are not truly safe. Has GWB made it safer and is it largely through his efforts, directly or indirectly, and through many things that the U.S. has done, that we have not yet had another attack o of any significance?
Absolutely, yes, I think so.
Among other things he has taken the action to THEIR yard and kept them busy keeping their themselves and their own families alive. That has relieved pressure over here.
Further, he has acted aggressively to anticipate plans, plots, preparations, and other activities which are directed to harming the U.S.
2006-09-11 04:58:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kentucky_Hillbilly 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No
Most terrorist attacks in this country are by US Citizens...
Tho we don't call them Terrorist Attacks per se..
I credit the CIA, FBI, and NSA for actually doing their job these past 5 years.
2006-09-11 04:57:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
"Au contraire, mon amie", I credit him for making the middle East more volatile and dangerous and for inciting more violence through his absurd and senseless foreign policy devoid of reason or logic, yet laced with arrogance and (misplaced)feelings of supremacy. Sad that this misguided man is a role model for millions.
Shows (to a lesser degree, thank God) how Hitler was able to entice millions to subscribe to his maniacal doctrines.
"It's the network."
2006-09-11 05:06:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Brilliant Platypus 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hell No! George W. Bush was the President that was asleep when the planes hit the towers. His Presidency is all about him saying, "Don't bother me, I am the decider!" which is about as straight forward as he can get. Megalomania is the word that describes his state of mind. He has delusions of grandeur that are worldwide and one inch deep.
2006-09-11 05:07:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by zclifton2 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I credit the soldiers and others in the military, not dubbya, the good ole Connecticut cowboy
2006-09-11 04:56:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by hungryhillkid 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. I credit him with setting up what will probably be the period of the most violence and hatred toward the US for the next decade or so.
2006-09-11 04:56:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
well i hate the guy but i'll give him credit, he's doing a good job protecting us.
2006-09-11 05:00:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Doomsday 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not. If it will give more steam to the administration's agenda, it will happen again. those who trust him are fools.
2006-09-11 05:02:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋