wouldnt it just be better if we blew pakistan, iraq, n. koria, lebanon, syria, and iran off the plannet?

Question

there all troublesom places if we got rid of them then the problems would be much smaller

snug you seem to forget that these kids alot of there parents were supporters of hezaballa:) and they teach there hate to there kids to grow up some day and defeat isreal so they have a racist hate against them so i would say ya there better off dead kids then alive kids

Answer 1

The amount of firepower needed to do what you want would destroy the planet in the nuclear fallout. So, no, it wouldn't be better in the end.

Answer 2

No, it wouldn't. The aggressor, "we", would remain. If "we" were to do something so heinous as to bomb these countries out of our own convenience, "we" would be the bad guy. All of the remaining countries would feel threatened and would take the place of the destroyed countries and become antagonistic towards "us" to protect themselves. This would make things worse, not better.

We need to remember that this is the 21st Century. Bombing other countries no longer instills fear in the bombed country like it did in previous centuries. Bombs and weapons have become commonplace and can be made at home with just a basic understanding of chemistry.

No, this is the century of trying to gain understanding and mutual respect both at home and abroad. If we are not careful, "we" will become the bad guy we have feared and hated throughout history.

Answer 3

But who made them troublesome places. We never had a problem with them before. Okay the Korean War, well that was in the 50's. The mid-east has been fighting within itself for 4000 years or so and we haven't been around that long. Also, what gives us the right to decide who stays who goes? I don't think America is a God like emulator.

Answer 4

hmm am lebanese
and after reading ur question i wasnt gonna answer cos usualy i only answer to HUMANS but wht the hell ill give it a try maybe u DO understand human's languages...
u wanna bomb those countries including mine? well sure why not go ahead.. how about u bomb israel and usa and uk while ur at it! i mean after all usa ignored and said no to EVERY request of cease fire! in the last lebanese/israel war as well as uk and lets not forget the 24/7 weapons shipments from the uk to israel
and of course good old israel "gods chosen ppl" heh gods chosen ppl to go to hell it seems cos the only thing tht they know to do is killing ppl how about u check this site ill provide and then tell me wht u think

http://www.fromisraeltolebanon.com/

Answer 5

At times, one is sorely tempted. But the vast majority of people in all those places are peaceful and good neighbors. It has, and for good reason, become less popular over time to injure innocent bystanders in an effort to get the bad guys.

Answer 6

No, they are masses of people and there many be plenty of good people amongst them.
But the world would benefit from blowing you away because, it is people like yourself who spread racism and mischief. We don't want people like you around. You are dangerous. And your supporters are dangerous. So by destroying people like yourself, we will ALL be safer.

If you want to be one of us, change yourself.

Good Luck and God Bless!

Answer 7

So much for diplomacy!
When your car breaks, do you blow it up?
If you have an argument with someone, does the first person to shoot and kill the other one win?
If you get cancer, should you just be shot now, instead of trying treatment?
We don't own the planet, we only get to share it.

Answer 8

No we'd be better off without people who's only solution to problems are "blowing other people off the planet".

Answer 9

A rather machiavellian way of dealing with the situation.

Answer 10

Think.

A small minority of fascist islamics want to kill those who pose a threat to their totalitarian way of life. Liberal democracies are the enemies of these fascist fanatics. Most of the people in the countries you mention are not our enemies.