2006-09-11 04:35:13 · 9 answers · asked by horrorfan 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I know some might think this sounds bad, but I kind of hope so. I think it's absolutely ridiculous to be paid several million dollars on any project that takes 3-4 months of easy "labor". Yes, some are talented and should get paid for their talent, but it's gotten very insane.
2006-09-11 04:42:28 · answer #1 · answered by torreyc73 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Alot of the studios have already said that they will start paying less. The ridiculous salaries of actors getting paid millions to pretend is on the decline.
2006-09-11 04:42:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a way, they have already begun to reduce their pay. Paramount let Mr. Cruise go & Jim Carrey and Ben Stiller have had projects pulled because of rising costs. Studios are less and less willing to risk tons of money on "star vehicles" or vanity projects. I think you will see more movies getting made in the 60 - 75 million dollar range.
Short Answer, Yes.
They'll make fewer movies so in effect, they will make less money.
2006-09-11 06:14:25 · answer #3 · answered by benthemovieman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I used to be an avid cinephile - I can't be bothered to pay 15 dollars to see any more drecht that Hollywood has been churning out. They better start paying actors less and pay more attention to crafting a good movie.
2006-09-11 04:37:48 · answer #4 · answered by tallblackchick 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm getting themes on the cinemas. three-D video clips supply me comprehensive on migraines. there is basically no get away from those massive reflects proper in my face, jerking from image to image and worst nevertheless shaky filming makes me favor to vomit. i have discovered sitting as some distance back contained in the target audience as attainable helps. And taking a liquid advil before the action picture starts helps. If that's a three-D action picture, I take more desirable means before the action picture starts and a 2d one halfway by the action picture. My determination is to easily no longer to bypass to the cinema. humorous, i'll handle a lengthy nighttime in a club or at a live performance with song so loud my pores and skin vibrates to the beat. i do not get action affliction. yet cinemas are painful.
2016-11-26 01:07:43 · answer #5 · answered by reguant 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. I think the teenage kids sneaking their friends into movies will get paid less.
2006-09-11 04:40:31 · answer #6 · answered by Kara 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they should,they should paid them even less when they do very low quality movies.
2006-09-11 04:49:34 · answer #7 · answered by Lost Phoenix 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One could only hope so.
2006-09-11 04:40:46 · answer #8 · answered by Amy Says So 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
That's a novel idea.
2006-09-11 04:40:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋