Iraq would have been better off with saddam in power, besides even colin powell said that he wasn't threat to anyone around him.
2006-09-11 04:33:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Fiesty Redhead 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
i do no longer see the assessment. they're the two significant, yet neither is or ever has been in conflict with the different. If the 'conflict on terrorism' ever did conflict with the form, i could say that the form grew to become into extra significant. yet right here is the capture. human beings interpret the form distinctive. as an occasion, the user-friendly passage, "Congress shall make no regulation respecting a company of religion, or prohibiting the unfastened workout thereof" has 200 million distinctive meanings to 2 hundred million distinctive human beings with each particular of their interpretation of this relatively user-friendly passage. So be careful how emphatic you get on your perspectives.
2016-12-18 08:32:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is that why Al Queda has named the Iraqi struggle the 1st front in the War on Terror? You may not think the Iraqi struggle is not part of the War on Terror BUT Al Queda doesn't think that!!
2006-09-11 05:13:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by therandman 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Why don't liberals understand that there is no Iraqi quagmire and it did have something to do with terrorism
and President DID NOT abandon the war on terror 5 years ago???????????
2006-09-11 04:49:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Bush isnt a Neo con. Phil Ghram is a Neocon. Lieberman is Neocon.
stop drinking the cool aid and lean the definition of the words you use
2006-09-11 04:40:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Super Shiraz 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Of course they realize it.
They're just counting on the American people not realizing it.
Don't assume that they're not disingenuous simply because they're sometimes inarticulate...as the poet Baudelaire observed 150 years ago, there is room for both evil & incompetence in the world...
2006-09-11 04:33:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by snowbaal 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
Did you ever realize that without the "spin" people would not be able to come up with their own opinions on issues?
2006-09-11 04:38:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You woul think that Tony Blair would have told him about northern Ireland and the IRA.
2006-09-11 04:55:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Boy you are insane we won already its not QUAGMlRE we are establishing a republic that will spread throw the Middle East changing it forever. You are not very wise to try to stop the formation of a freed people and are misinformation its self.
2006-09-11 04:49:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Because Condoleeza Rice and Dick Cheney keep shoving it down our throats that there was a link. It seems not to matter that there was no Al Qaeda in Iraq until there were US soldiers in Iraq.
2006-09-11 04:43:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7
·
3⤊
2⤋