It's hard to stop both. The countries where these are most prevalent do not have the money, people, or resources for a major crackdown. Proper education is one solution, teach people how to farm efficiently without burning down forests. Get it into the heads of the Chinese that their "traditional remedies" do not work and they're driving animals to extinction.
2006-09-11 02:51:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Blue Jean 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The deforestation is mostly happening in drought conditions. In Ecuador Texaco spent $1,000,000 a month to keep the roads open so we could get the oil for u. It was so bad even the fence post would sprout and grow into trees. , that is the jungle taking the road back. We had about 100 in. per year.
2006-09-11 10:20:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by JOHNNIE B 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, with the current global human population of 6 billion plus and steadily rising, conflicts between human interests (need to raise crops, need for timber to build shelters) there is probably no easy way to stop either one.
The best thing for the planet in general would probably be to get rid of lot of the humans. Especially the ones in North America who consume a lot more per capita than the other countries. I can't see anyone volunteering to be one of the ones who gets culled, however. Speaking as one of the more useless members of society, ecologically speaking, I certainly wouldn't vote for this option.
Maybe what we need is a good pandemic or global catastrophe to knock down our population to a manageable level.
2006-09-11 12:46:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why stop it? God says the animals and plants are there for us to eat. Anything to the contrary is Anti-Christian.
2006-09-11 09:54:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes it can be, as they are man made.
2006-09-11 19:41:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by moosa 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
it cant! muhahahahahahahaha! HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
2006-09-11 09:55:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋