The mass media, (newspapers and TV) are primarily owned by a small group of people, who are Zionists.
They have their own private agenda which includes taking control of the world. They control most governments, the Bank of England, most major banks, the oil companies, and most major corporations.
They only publicise propaganda which supports their cause, which includes war, the reduction of people's liberties, and the reduction of the world's population.
they are the ones who decide major government candidates, no matter which party they belong to.
Blair is one of their chosen ones, so they support him.
They control the secret services like MI6, the CIA , Mossad, and Pakistan's ISI.
They try to keep people in state of terror so that the people demand increased security, and are prepared to forego their freedoms in exchange.
These same people are the ones who conduct most of the terrorist events like 7/7, 9/11 Lockerbie, etc., and then blame it on Muslims.
Yes you are right.
The news is merely propaganda.
Did you know that Al Qaeda was created by the CIA
See movie below.
2006-09-12 15:24:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because if they start to question the policies and the reason for the policies that will lead to a whole questioning behind the war on terror, EG an independent and open and honest look at 911. This would mean looking at the role of the intelligence services and their creation of terrorism worldwide and their ongoing role in such things as false flag operations to this day. (Operation Northwoods anyone?)
The BBC news has many departments filled with public school MI5 or MI6 operatives, They will never allow truth to come out. We can hate Blair or Comeron, or Brown, for from this the public can be assured (tricked) that they are in control because of a powerful word called democracy, but the underlying agenda must never be exposed.
2006-09-11 09:11:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by kenhallonthenet 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is obivious to me that you want the answers to your question to be along the same lines as your point of view.Well i dont agree with your view and here is why
I'm from Dublin-Ireland and i agree with Tony Blair's actions i watch "all'' the Brittish news networks and i'm convinced that you do not because i have seen on numerous times accross all the networks, Blair being asked tough questions about his forgein policy and he has stood his ground and taken the critics on and he does not hmm an haw while doing so .
As regards the BBC Network ,well there is a bit of a history between Blair and its over a certain few reporters there put out lies about blair and the BBC had to retract.So you say that the BBC is now supporting Blair by throwing its propaganda power behind him why should they do this ,
Nowadays all networks have reporters (of which a large number are non white and from the actual area where the report is comming from)these reporters are on the ground day in day out getting both sides of the story and informing the viewing public about what is going on in the world...and if these reports are seen by you as pro Blair propaganda, You need to look at the overall picture and not just a few segments here and there.
As regards the Brittish media as a whole.it has no comparrison it has exposed quite a lot of politions from across ALL the political parties including the labour party .I believe the brittish media are quite sharp in this day and age to allow it's self to be used as a propaganda tool.
i will turn on my TV today and i can guarantee you that i'll see people being killed by suicide bobers etc etc this is the reality and it was going on long before America and Brittain got envolved in the war on terror, this is fact not pro Blair/Bush propaganda .Sadly it will still be happening long after BUSH and BLAIR are out of office just as it was going on long before they came to power .....TERROR IN THE MIDDLE EAST HAS BEEN THE STATUS NORM FOR OVER 2000 YEARS.....
2006-09-11 10:06:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by SPEAK UP WAKE UP 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the BBC has to be biased the last time a documentary hung out the governments dirty washing the top man(sorry i forgot his name) at the BBC had to go.and the reporter was sacked and then as usual the whole sorry business was found to be true only to be swept under the carpet as per usual
the spin and underhand tactics don't seem to be working now though do they. the government as with every thing else must have got it wrong and underestimated all us electorate and no one is more pleased than me to see that arrogant smarmy **** Blair being humiliated the way hes humiliated this country ,and i dont think hell hang on to his job til next year
2006-09-13 22:00:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by keny 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I listen to bbc radio 4 and it is extreamly open minded in its reporting and has discussions from all sides of issues, people who relie on the sun, mirror, or daily mail or itv news for their information of whats going on currently have there yes blinkerd but you can make out whats not true if you question what you hear. Trouble is most dont, and many believ in hearsay !!!
Most people i talk to are not pro blair, and the bbc have questioned some of the wrong that goes on. Yes they do ignor important stories and report on what victoria beckham is wearing or whos shaggin who in the royal family..
Bring back Greg Dyke i say, that guy was all for transparent reporting and getting to the truth!!!!
2006-09-11 09:49:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jabba_da_hut_07 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The vast media corporations are run by the same group who operate within our own governments as a 'government within a government'. One cannot get accountability because they do not believe in it. The true rulers of these news organisations are a bunch of terrorists. The creators of myths.
The media corporations cannot by their real nature allow true debate. It trivialises issues instead. In areas of conflict it does not allow or encourage BOTH sides a fair hearing. This Jesuitry of modern television/radio broadcasting is of course a cancer. It is as far removed from fair reporting as are goverments from the people who elected them. Media is powerful propaganda. That is why its messages are so notoriously corrupt. Unaccountability is the litmus test of tyrany.
2006-09-11 11:57:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by democracynow 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
whos losing the war on terror, you mean the war at home, the media is the real terror , they are pro agenda, in the UK and US, when people dont support there own military whether for or against what they are ordered to do then the war is lost.....you have a right to believe what you will but as far as the military goes, they are the true victims out there as far as who is the first to get hurt, other wise, its just the muslims killing muslims in majority at present......obviously blair is doing a good job at your home front , like preventing those terrorists in recent weeks....
2006-09-11 08:57:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by lost&confused 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the media is controlled by the zionists who wish to maintain the status quo. Watch Channel 4 or Sky news for slightly less biased reporting.
2006-09-11 08:59:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Roxy 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
ever hear of how governments use the news to further their own goals....however this may also only be to get the point across that it is a pressing issue for the people to see
2006-09-11 08:56:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Ego 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
What makes you think we are pro Blair on anything?
2006-09-11 08:55:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Francis7 4
·
0⤊
1⤋