English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

nope not at all...heres why---people always have and always will hate america-no matter who the president is--they hate us cause we are not them and the way we live..trust me they still would of gotten in those planes and killed all those people...if anything if there was a different president their plans may have been delayed at the most--not completly stopped...their hate is too strong for them to reconsider for any president

2006-09-11 01:51:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The 9/11 attacks were being set up long before Bush came on the scene. The first bombing of the WTC was supposed to bring it down.

Contrary to popular belief, we did not know 9/11 was going to happen. There was info out there but nothing specific. Using "avtation" could mean alot of things.

If Bin Laden had been handled properly during the Clinton era, we might not be having this conversation.

2006-09-11 08:59:13 · answer #2 · answered by groomingdiva_pgh 5 · 0 0

Without question yes!

Bush is just a front man for a much wider american/economic imperialist conspiracy to last many decades. Whether it was a democrat or republican in the white house, it would make no difference in what direction american foreign policy will take in the next few decades. The people that we see in power are nothing but muses created for public consumption. The real operators, as always, are hidden from view. They move in shadows doing whatever they like( in the name of america) without any recourse. Worse of all these operators believe that the ends justify the means and innocent people can be used as pawns in a campaign to project american power on planet earth.

This is the world we live in. America has been hijacked.

2006-09-11 08:52:56 · answer #3 · answered by zamir 2 · 0 1

Probably, yes. Cause, policies are made in Congress. President merely implements them. If then someone else were there, then also those policies and imperial attitude to the world remained same, and as a protest (though in a wrong way, and - I hate terrorism) they have hit WTC.
Hope Terrorism will be abolished from this small planet- by any organization-AlQuida/US +UK Govt/CIA or any other orgn-- cause we even do not have enough place to keep our smile, so how could we make room for terrorism?

2006-09-11 08:57:34 · answer #4 · answered by c s 2 · 0 0

Yes, I do because the events of that day did not come all of a sudden with a new president.He may have been the target because he is in the front seat so to speak but what came had started long befor. To say he is the blame can not be the final word.

2006-09-11 09:12:27 · answer #5 · answered by Conway 4 · 0 0

I think he missed the signs, but I can't say it would not have happened if he wasn't president. I think he let a few things slide off his desk and in a sense dropped the ball. Not listening to the people that really saw this coming. He was to busy trying to figure out how he could get us back in Iraq to think about Osama.

2006-09-11 09:00:48 · answer #6 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

Yes, but the nation would possibly have been better prepared when Bush had not pushed away all the work done by Clinton.
Also, the American reaction would probably have been quite different. I think that Iraq would have not been attacked as it was, but rather been brought under control by other and better means than a full scale war, that only benefits profiteers and oil men.

2006-09-11 08:54:32 · answer #7 · answered by Hi y´all ! 6 · 0 1

If Clinton had opened his eyes prior to 9/11, or if we had someone other than Clinton, maybe... I don't blame it on Bush but I definitely blame Clinton. He was too concerned with getting him some...

2006-09-11 09:00:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, nothing would have changed. The anger these people have is directed at the distorted vision they have of America, not at the president.

2006-09-11 08:53:47 · answer #9 · answered by pvreditor 7 · 1 0

Yes, it's not about the President in charge.

2006-09-11 08:53:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers