2006-09-11 01:37:52 · 18 answers · asked by john_0502000 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Well i would say u are right...After 9 11 everyone associated Muslim with terrorists.Muslim=terrorist...I am not saying that the families of the victims didn't suffered,'cos I am sure they did,but the ones who paid a higher price for this were the Muslims all around the world...In US and Europe they were discriminated and ,now,5 years after,they still are... And Bush policy in the Middle east had much to do with this...
2006-09-11 04:03:22 · answer #1 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The answer is yes. Not only Bush, but also the American news media have made the Muslims suffer greatly in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. They have been picked on constantly! And non-stop! All I know is that most Muslims DO NOT TOLERATE the terrorists hijacking their religion and using it to kill people in Allah's name.
2006-09-11 01:45:09 · answer #2 · answered by brian 2010 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
YES (even though the survivors, family , friends suffer think also of the muslim people who were killed when US invaded those countries)
If there are some stupid idiotic supreme fundalists does that mean every single muslim is like that. You can't judge someone by race and you shouldn't. Give them a chance.
2006-09-11 02:01:26 · answer #3 · answered by lalala2512 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, I don't think they suffered, although I think that 11/9 was the turning point and that people started to see what these people are really about.
2006-09-11 01:46:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
you're at a loss for words. it rather is Europe who considers Muslims to be "babies of the colonies". contained regarding Pakistanis in great Britain the prepare of "Paki Bashing" (beating up Pakistanis) is going back to the Sixties. it rather is Europe who compelled Muslim migrants into public housing ghettos and limited their employment and academic possibilities. The U.S. is the main open society on earth. I actual have a mosque approximately 4 miles from my place of living. it rather is bracketed with the help of two Christian church homes. i will't think of certainly one of those certainty in Lahore or Islamabad. certainly one of my physicians is from Pakistan. And he's a Muslim. We went into Afghanistan with the aid of fact the Taliban does not turn over Usama Bin laden and something of the "Hirabah" (terrorists) to us. besides, the Taliban allowed the operation of many Jihadi Madrassas, designed to instruct youthful Muslim adult men a thank you to habit martyrdom operations against the Jahili regimes of the West. This contains the killing of Muslims besides, decrease than the heretical doctrine of "Takfir". the two are a Harram (an offense against the Koran). BTW, as quickly as we invaded Afghanistan, the extra youthful Marine Corporal who raised the U.S. flag on the flag submit at Bagram Air Base replaced into an Afghan-American and a Muslim!
2016-11-07 02:23:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would imagine the people who suffered the most were those who survived and those who lost their families. Some of these were muslims, some were christians, some were buddhists, some were atheists. Doesn't really matter which religion they were from.
2006-09-11 01:43:27 · answer #6 · answered by Julez 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The Sikhs did, as people could not tell the difference between them and muslims
2006-09-11 01:39:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. Most Muslims have NOT denounced the attacks. Most have NOT taken up arms agains the attackers.
2006-09-11 01:48:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
no ,anyone who lost loved ones did,some Muslims might have been treated poorly,but that does not compare to undeserved death the family's had to face
2006-09-11 01:41:02 · answer #9 · answered by san_ann68 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think so too, I think they're still paying for it until today and the proof is Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon and who knows who's to come next.
2006-09-11 01:39:59 · answer #10 · answered by rinah 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋