Please do not say they were not violated. It is very clear that they were if you do your research. If you do not believe me read Professor Jones peer reviewed paper. Again if you want to give a scholarly answer do not deny that the laws were broken.
2006-09-10 19:56:52 · 19 answers · asked by Luke F 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The laws of physics were not violated.
Just because a few "professors" joined the ranks of the conspiracy nuts and published a paper. They are still unable to violate the laws of physics.
2006-09-10 19:58:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Professor Jones puts forward a hypothesis, but in doing so he claims that the other hypotheses "violate the laws of physics". Professor Jones is NOT an expert in structural engineering, materials science, fire damage, or demolition techniques. Neither am I. On the face of it Professor Jones' hypothesis is plausible, but equally the NIST hypothesis is plausible. The simple fact of the matter is that nobody can point to a definitive example of how a WTC tower would collapse because it has never happened, and nobody has modelled it: we simply don't know for sure how they would collapse when damaged in the way they were. Few other buildings have the same engineering structure as the WTC towers, so comparison with other building collapses can be highly misleading.
2006-09-11 03:50:38 · answer #2 · answered by Graham I 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 'conspiracy theory' answers all. The US government needed to show it's people a real grave threat to the american people as an alibi to attack Afghanistan.
The true motive may well be hidden into the next century. The only plausible reason that comes to my mind is USAs obsession with Oil & Gas.- Afghanistan is the key to unlocking the Oil & Gas from Central Asian countries eg Turkmenistan, etc and there on thru Pakistan to the ports.
We also have history to support the 'conspiracy theory'. I distinctly remember having read in some international news magazine (circa 1984-85)- that some researchers looking thru then recently declassified archives of WW II had found evidence that 'Japanese Admiral was paid millions of Dollars to attack Pearl Harbour by the US government'. The uproar and threat perception arising from Pearl Harbour helped Public Opininion for US participation in the WW II. (Few weeks after this publication all researchers were separately reported dead in Road accidents etc.)
Hope it answers.
2006-09-12 08:16:54 · answer #3 · answered by kapilbansalagra 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They were only broken by propaganda and lies.
There is no way that the conspiracy theory put forward by the 9/11 Conmission cabn be true.
Of course the Laws of Physics were not violated in reality, because the story that we were given is not really true.
For a beetre explanation see below
2006-09-13 00:46:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where's the debris from the plane that hit the Pentagon? Why did it only make a hole in the side of the building, with no evidence of wings? Why wasn't there a skid mark on the greens outside the Pentagon? Why did WTC 7 mysteriously fall and yet no other surrounding buildings collapse? Why did Condoleeza Rice call the Mayor of SanFransisco on 9/10 to tell him not to fly the next day? Hmmmm.
2006-09-11 03:01:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why do new houses collapse?
Why are there lessons to be learned when people are being highly paid for that service.
Why so many expert witnesses @ £1000 a throw. when the equally paid defending witness collects the same fee?
Corruption, corruption,corruption.
The laws of physics were not violated, they were never applied.
2006-09-11 03:08:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that alot of things dont add up or make sense, in regards to 9/11.
it surprises me that people always seem to believe what they are told, by the media or the government, however surely its obvious we will only be told what they want us to know, and are both proven liars.
im not saying that i know that weve been lied to nor am i suggesting that what happened wasnt horrific, all i am saying is read ,learn and make up your own mind on ANY subject.
2006-09-11 05:45:27 · answer #7 · answered by tammy g 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
5 years have past. Give it up already. Peer reviewed indeed.
2006-09-11 03:05:26 · answer #8 · answered by P P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It gets late and the conspiracy nuts come out of hiding. Go listen to Art Bell and hush.
2006-09-11 03:05:02 · answer #9 · answered by Jeff F 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds as though you have forgotten to take your medication again Lukey-boy.
2006-09-11 06:22:44 · answer #10 · answered by intelligent_observer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋