English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The world made a loud cry when Isarel attacked Lebanan

Why the world is mum on America and England

Killing of Iraquis and Afganis under the name of Terrorism
How far this is justified

Who is going to decide wheter the killed ones are Talibanis , Al-Quida or "INNOCENT"

If Terrorist are balamed for killing of Innocent
What about NATO , US and UK

If Saddam is prodecuted for killing 500 + Iraquis way back

Who will punish Bush and Balir for killing 50 + Iraquis Daily

Wake up
Find the Answer

Or

World is close to Dead End

2006-09-10 19:06:26 · 15 answers · asked by |!V!|ai 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

15 answers

Nice timing...so close to 9/11!! The death of innocents is fresh on American's minds. The terrorists that killed innocents. The middle East hates Americans and would kill us all if they could. You are right, I feel for the innocents that died. The innocent victims of terrorist attacks. The innocent American soldiers ripped from their families to go fight evil. I do not feel bad for terrorists or their supporters.

2006-09-10 19:16:21 · answer #1 · answered by Nikki Tesla 6 · 5 0

Saddam killed "500" Iraquis "way back"? Excuse me? Try again. He's slaughtered thousands upon thousands OF HIS OWN PEOPLE, using weapons of mass destruction. Oh, and by the way, US troops are finding some of his WMD's, and have been for some time... but the liberal drive-by media have chosen to ignore that fact.

2006-09-10 19:15:45 · answer #2 · answered by answerman63 5 · 6 0

Anyone not from their respective countries is considered collateral damage (Israel uses that one quite a lot) ie: 1 'terrorist' hides in building, its fair to flatten the whole building and kill all the innocent residents to get that one terrorist, the residents are simply classified as collateral damage, wrong place wrong time, tough luck!! However if it were the other way round, then they would be considered 'brutally murdered victims of Muslim fanatics' who never did anything wrong to anyone', go figure. Fathead got it right, they who are in power maketh the rules, they simply TELL you whats going to happen (regardless of contrary evidence to the facts) and being the fickle sheep that we are, we conform.Remember only the winners can write the history books, and those guys think they're shakespear.

2006-09-10 19:34:16 · answer #3 · answered by zac 2 · 0 2

Lets get our facts straight shall we?
Israel defended itself from Lebanon.
Saddam killed way more than 500 people. In-fact he continued the killing of innocents up until the war broke out.
Bush and Blair are not responsible for killing Iraqi's, your terrorist buddies and their IED's, roadside bombs, and suicide attacks are responsible for the majority of deaths taking place in Iraq.

To find the real answers go here: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

2006-09-10 19:11:25 · answer #4 · answered by AirborneSaint 5 · 5 0

So are you saying that the children killed on 911 in New York do not deserve some justice? How many plane's killed Muslim extremists before 911 2001? why do people always want to forget this bit of truth?

2006-09-10 19:14:14 · answer #5 · answered by not coming back 3 · 5 0

With this world so full of murder on a daily basis there are times I feel this is about those at the top of the pyramid reducing the global population in a manner that they feel is justifiable.

2006-09-10 20:08:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So I guess that makes Winston Churchill and FDR cruel evil terrorist. All those innocent Germans. They could have simply pushed the Nazi army back into Germany and stopped there.

2006-09-10 19:17:38 · answer #7 · answered by Zak 5 · 6 0

Peace and May God be With You.

The loss of so many innocent civilians in Iraq is as terrible as the loss of innocent civilians on 9/11 for they were not military targets. Osama bin Laden has exceeded his cause, but your Presidents have also exceeded their causes. Saddam was not even a good Muslim, we don't care about him, for his evil days killed also many innocent people. But the continue onslaught of Muslims everywhere will not bring peace. What will bring peace is to understand what we see in unfair, the treatment of Arabs in the Middle-East, and American and British soldiers on Arab Land.

Peace and May God be with You.

2006-09-10 19:13:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Osama, Ohmert, Musharef, Bush, Blair, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice et al, are war criminals. Period. They have all committed extreme crime against our common humanity. The end or goals don't justify the means. Until this lot is prosecuted and sentenced to life imprisonment with hard labour, we cannot talk of a normal world again. It is now the moral duty of all Americans and British to prosecute these people. Humanity is calling on you to cast aside your party, racial, religious and every biase, to see the deaths deliberatly inflicted on innocents. May God bless all of us.

2006-09-10 19:13:15 · answer #9 · answered by Fontonfrom 2 · 1 3

Killing any innocent human being is a crime....and what Bush and Blair did is a crime against humanity....and don't worry...those who are not punished on earth...will get the worst punishment in HELL... and same goes with Taliban...Al Qaeda..and the rest of the terrorist pigs.

2006-09-10 19:09:31 · answer #10 · answered by Marcos 4 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers