2006-09-10 18:25:15 · 16 answers · asked by not coming back 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes -- nobody serves the purpose of terrorist like Democrats, so for the sake of our future, please vote Republican.
2006-09-10 18:30:46 · answer #1 · answered by t_o_w_e_r_i_n_g 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Not necessarily. Look closely what the candidates views are and vote accordingly.
It takes more than the President to get rid of the terriorists. It takes a lot of planning, cooperation in the Congress and ordinary citizen participation to nip this thing. So far, Congress isn't doing anything now to help seal the borders. No one is gonna do a darn thing until after the election and that's sad.
2006-09-10 18:42:39 · answer #2 · answered by Sunny louise 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Voting Democrat or Republican is neither a vote for or against terrorism, but neither is it wise. To really make a difference, vote independent.
2006-09-10 18:31:22 · answer #3 · answered by Lonnie P 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Naw. George Bush and Friends ARE terrorists, when you see what they've done to Iraq. And they've BUNGLED so much on homeland security and the War on (t)error that it's almost funny. Osama Bin Laden is still at large; terrorist recruitment and training is way up; WMDs have never been found; government in America has only grown larger, as civil liberties have shrunk; the death toll for American personnel in Iraq has now SURPASSED THE DEATH TOLL OF 9-11 as of Wednesday (cnn.com); and while Bush has been bombing the crap out of Iraq, North Korea and Iran have stepped up their nuclear capabilities.
Bush has spared Al-Qaeda a lot of work, frankly.....
2006-09-10 18:29:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No voting Redpublican is the same as selling your soul to Satan.
Well maybe a a little worse than selling your soul because you would have to be possessed to vote for a Redpublican candidate or issue.
Go big Red Go
2006-09-10 19:00:17 · answer #5 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The terrorists attacked while a republican was in office, and since (and because of) George Bush, they have attacked us more and more. It's the foreign policy they don't like, and since our politicians are so incompetent we have to do what the terrorists want, that is, change foreign policy.
2006-09-10 18:30:27 · answer #6 · answered by John 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Look at it this way...what if Al Gore had been president on 9/11? Do you think he would have done anything substantial? No! He would have followed in Bubbas footsteps and bombed some more aspirin factories. Then when he thought we weren't looking he would sell some more secrets to the Chinese. What is more of a threat to our country: terrorism or Global Warming?
2006-09-10 18:48:28 · answer #7 · answered by Cinner 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It really depends more on the president than the party. Though I severely doubt any presidential candidate, republican or democrat is for the cause of terrorism.
2006-09-10 18:30:10 · answer #8 · answered by Love of Truth 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you DO vote for another republican president that would be a vote FOR terrorists. lets not have another bush episode. have you learned nothing>
2006-09-10 18:26:53 · answer #9 · answered by jobugg257 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
What? No, I disagree with that logic. I don't believe anyone is FOR terrorists. LOL
2006-09-10 18:29:40 · answer #10 · answered by azile_wehttam 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋