Do you believe the attacks on 9-11 Were an inside job?

Question

I do.
The amount of evience the govt carried out the attacks are overwheming.
I will name a few out of dozens.

1. 7 hiajckers turned up alive.
2. 1200% Increase in put options linking to the CIA
3. Larry silverstein addmitted blowing up WTC..it is so osbvious the 9/11 Commision report wont even touch it.
4. Cell phones wont work above 30k feet.
5. Theremite was found at the scene, used to cut steel.
6. Buildings fell at the speed of gravity, Science says controlled domolition.
7. Debris from the building was taken and illegally sold to china before anybody could really investigate.
8.How can a plane make a 270 degree turn and drop 7000 feet in attitude in less then 2 minutes, and leave a 16' hole at the pentagon?
9. The "hijackers" said the wrong islamic message when approaching death
10. Bin Laden was Writting with his Right hand on video.

Visit my site: http://www.myspace.com/conspiracyalert
Any insulting repsonses proof u have no arguement.

Answer 1

YES! It could have never worked out without some inside job.

Answer 2

I don't.

No evidence that the 7 hijackers were alive. If they did, shouldn't the US government look up for these guys, just in case a big surprise happen again? CIA involvement was as far as their mistakes in hiring Ali Mohamed, the Radical Muslim and an ex- soldier who was on the watch list in Egypt, as an informant who turned out to be the spy for Laden. Their mistake was also not seeing the fact behind his background in the first place. Larry Silverstein was too upset to see the towers went down like cookie crumble, why should we bother him? How do you know that cellphones didn't work above 30ft? If the phone on the airplane works why it shouldn't work? Science was not always accurate. Why did NASA overbuild the Rockets if there's still victims carried out in the flight out? It would take forever to investigate on the debris, by then the terrorist would have another attack somewhere before we even figure it out what made the building collapse which was already obvious that the top part crumbled and fell on the middle part which caused a domino effect. Why would they sell debris in China while we get more stuff from China? The plane crashed couldn't be calculated. The media only calculated of what they saw and heard. If it could collapse the 2 towers it could certainly leave 16' hole. Did you know what was the message they were saying, I guess you happen to know Arabic language, which we all should suspect that about you. Who cares if Bin Laden wrote with which hand, so what is the relevant to that fact. We all know that he's the master mind of all the terrorist act.

Answer 3

Yeah, the whole thing was set up by the government. They planted bombs in the bottom of the WTC and the planes crashing into it were just photoshopped. We are really friends with the terrorists and plotting with them to take over the world. That is honestly the stupidest thing I have ever heard in my life. I swear, liberals will make up anything just so they can say that Bush and his administration are pure evil.

Answer 4

The only help provided by the USA was when clinton was in office. Because of his wanting to protect his own butt more then the American people he let ABL get away. The clintion administration was incompetent and allow the terrorist to plan this attack on America. Its fools like the one who posted this question and the liberals who betrayed America.

Answer 5

Loose Change video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&hl=en

Debate between Loose Change and Popular Mechanics
http://www.democracynow.org/streampage.pl?issue=20060911

"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist."
- Charles Baudelaire

Answer 6

yes it was an inside job

inside Osama Bin Laden's troop of turds they thought the 9/11attack up and then pulled it off.

it was such a good inside job no one but the terrorists knew it was going to happen.

Answer 7

man i beiev that they knew that that was going to happend because they got a movie out about it and how it was going to happen

Answer 8

It was indeed. America needs war, they hv to spend that huge budget.

Answer 9

I will say this much...

I do agree in principle with what you are saying, but I also really think you are trying *way* too hard to actually craft a theory where none is needed. The real evidence is out there, literally hidden in plain sight.

Go to the _Wall Street Journal_ website, search their Archives for September and October 2000 articles about Dick Cheney's prior job as CEO of Halliburton Inc. See if any *names* turn up in terms of *business partners*. The man was on a first-name basis with Osama's *dad*, ok?

Also, go to the Esquire website, search their year 1999 archives for the Bin Laden Interview. Seriously. The man himself made his intent clear two years in advance before the whole world.

There is no need to craft this huge, Oliver-Stone-Caliber conspiracy theory here. None at all, the evidence that Cheney called in a favor for his buddy Dubya is *right there in front of you*. Dubya said the New Economy needed to end, and when the American people showed signs of not cooperating with him and his Big Oil fatcat buddies....well, somebody tore a page from Nixon's book of dirty deeds and *terrorized a whole nation* into silence and acquiescense.

Unless, of course, you *wish* to prove your theory wrong, in which case you make it as elaborate and implausible and fictitious as humanly possible.

You're trying too hard. You're really trying to push an agenda completely *opposed* to the one you SAY you're selling, aren't you? You're doing all of this, your website and all, as one big paid-for *reduction to absurdity* aren't you?

When the proof, like I said, has been there all along (you don't even need to go online, just head to a larger Public Library with good magazine and newspaper archives) and is really simpler than *anything* you could imagine. Simpler and sadder too.

We were sold out. Nothing more nor less.

Edit/Update: "mightyt100"....I'm going to ignore your personal attack at the end of your post, that "You are stupid" bit because a personal attack is NOT an argument no matter how much you might wish it were so, ok?

And....if you think I am going to refute you point by point here, guess what? I don't have to. The *Question* was about ONE terror attack, on September 11, 2001, in the United States. Nothing less and nothing MORE. The fact that you have to drag in two *decades* worth of death and carnage into this and the whole entire rest of the world too....this just shows you don't have much of an argument, at face value, to stand on, that you have to appeal to Violent Threat of death and carnage. I mean, what are you going to do next, bring up Vietnam? Maybe Hiroshima and Nagasaki? How about that Civil War?

Or maybe you could bring up the Pirates of the Barbary Coast, and how Thomas Jefferson had to create the U.S. Navy (at no small expense or controversy back then) to deal with *that* Muslim threat back then.

Point is....how relevant is it to 9-11? You can demonstrate the trend of Muslim violence much more easily with current events, like the Danish cartoon fiasco, but that doesn't have *as much* shock value as reading out the names of Everyone Who Has Ever Died, Like Ever, does it?

Not to mention, these aren't even your own words are they? You copied and pasted the whole damn thing straight out of your Wikipedia Link and added NOTHING of your own. I think that might be called Plagiarism, also known as Idea Theft, or Stealing Someone's Published Intellectual Property, which is against Yahoo's own rules here.

So really....as sad and tragic as Wiki's list of all the death and carnage is, I still wonder. What *do* you have to say? Do YOU have anything to say at all? Is it going to be even remotely related to the actual events of 9-11, or is it going to be more paid for Plagiarism and Trolling?

Too bad we aren't ever going to know, because I am Reporting you for Idea Theft. Good bye. :)

Answer 10

who knows--but if it was shame on Bush because he had to have known something