No,there is no proof that Iran violated the NPT.We have no proof that they want to build a nuclear weapon,witch would be a violation of the treaty,witch says that the nuclear program should be used only in civilian purpose...
No one dares to question US about the nuclear weapons and Israel refuses to sign the treaty...
2006-09-10 19:34:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tinkerbell05 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Iran signed the agreement and besides for the fact that according to its terms a regime change does not affect the status of breach, it was a post revolution Iran that signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Now, Israel on the other hand did not sign the Treaty, nor where they ever asked to.
The US, Russia, UK France and other Nuclear developed countries have all signed a common treaty other then the non-proliferation treaty, which binds them to duties such as funding problem solving measures, such as monitoring radiation and of course monitoring each others usage of Nuclear technology so that everyone know everyone is cool with each other. In other words its the end of the cold war in the form of a sustained treaty.
It is common knowledge in the Nuclear community that Israel is a forum of Nuclear Technology that is collected from Jewish scientists that work or previously worked in the various programs around the world. It is therefore commonly accepted that Israel is the world's 'big brother' in the know about everything. Therefore it is commonly accepted that if there ever will be a wide disbanding of military nuclear facilities, Israel's will be the last.
Big brother out last.
2006-09-10 17:37:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Piffle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
to the best of my knowledge, iran did not sign for a "nuclear non-proliferation treaty" so how could they violate it?
anyway, the united states has always been so insecure to other emerging powers in the world that's why they keep on making issues and destroying images of some of these nations....
the united states feels that they are the world's most powerful, yet the sad truth is not!
2006-09-10 18:10:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by plutoeffesus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Technically the Israeli have no nuclear armaments. They do have the purposes to place a nuclear warhead mutually in twenty minutes flat yet they have no working bombs to hand. As for the treaty? i've got confidence the Israeli government knew it would tie their palms on a similar time as the the Arabians would be unfastened to do as they please. As for Iran's signing of the treaty? it relatively is as trustworthy as a paper mache' bridged around the Jordan river. Their notice potential no longer something whilst their existence is spent attempting to wipe Israel off the face of the map. EDIT: Jack H has a factor you be attentive to. while you at the instant are not arranged for the respond then do no longer ask the question. 2nd EDIT: perhaps they do have 4 hundred warheads, i don't be attentive to how many they do have. My recommendations got here from a checklist in a Canadian Newspaper: "The Toronto daily celeb". contained in the object the author reported that during spite of the indisputable fact that Israel have the warheads they are "inert". however the IDF have a layout which will enable the rustic to arm themselves with a nuclear weapon in twenty minutes. So ... technically the rustic does no longer have nuclear weapons. they have the wherewithal to create one in a count number of twenty minutes.
2016-09-30 13:47:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by huenke 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT]
Provisions
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, also referred to as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), obligates the five acknowledged nuclear-weapon states (the United States, Russian Federation, United Kingdom, France, and China) not to transfer nuclear weapons, other nuclear explosive devices, or their technology to any non-nuclear-weapon state. Non-nuclear-weapon States Parties undertake not to acquire or produce nuclear weapons or nuclear explosive devices. They are required also to accept safeguards to detect diversions of nuclear materials from peaceful activities, such as power generation, to the production of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices. This must be done in accordance with an individual safeguards agreement, concluded between each non-nuclear-weapon State Party and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Under these agreements, all nuclear materials in peaceful civil facilities under the jurisdiction of the state must be declared to the IAEA, whose inspectors have routine access to the facilities for periodic monitoring and inspections. If information from routine inspections is not sufficient to fulfill its responsibilities, the IAEA may consult with the state regarding special inspections within or outside declared facilities.
Status
The Treaty was opened for signature on 01 July 1968, and signed on that date by the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and 59 other countries. The Treaty entered into force with the deposit of US ratification on 05 March 1970. China acceeded to the NPT on 09 March 1992, and France acceded on 03 August 1992. In 1996, Belarus joined Ukraine and Kazakhstan in removing and transferring to the Russian Federation the last of the remaining former Soviet nuclear weapons located within their territories, and each of these nations has become a State Party to the NPT, as a non-nuclear-weapon state. In June 1997 Brazil became a State Party to the NPT.
The NPT is the most widely accepted arms control agreement. As of early 2000 a total of 187 states were Parties to the NPT. Cuba, Israel, India, and Pakistan were the only states that were not members of the NPT.
In accordance with the terms of the NPT, on May 11, 1995 more than 170 countries attended the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference (NPTREC) in New York. Three decisions and one resolution emanated from NPTREC. First, the NPT was extended for an indefinite duration and without conditions. Second, Principles and Objectives for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament were worked out to guide the parties to the treaty in the next phase of its implementation. Third, an enhanced review process was established for future review conferences. Finally, a resolution endorsed the establishment of a zone free of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East.
2006-09-10 18:27:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by sunny 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Last I knew, Iran was not a signatory of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, so how could they violate it?
2006-09-10 17:27:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sordenhiemer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Iran developed nuclear weapons then it would be more competition for the US and the US likes to be the most powerful.
2006-09-10 17:24:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Roland D. 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran is not nuclear, we are bugging everyone, Israel has hundreds of bombs, but US govt doesn't bug them Iranians are years away but peaceful ways collide/coincide with weapons
2006-09-10 17:26:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Freddy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
After seeing what happen to Afghanistan and Iraq I think they probably want to defend themselves. Bush is like the kid who makes the rules of the game as he plays but doesn't follow the rules he makes. What if China do a preemptive attack on US for terrorizing Muslims. It's all a mess and it's sad.
2006-09-10 17:31:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jose R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
if they did so what
2006-09-10 17:24:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋