Should it the smartest?
2006-09-10 16:38:36 · 14 answers · asked by beyonduniverse 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
the weak shouldn't survive...the strongest should because they have the will power and strength to do anything they wanna do.
2006-09-10 16:41:55 · answer #1 · answered by UnholySoldier 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's not the strongest who survive, but the fittest. If a smart person can use his brain power to make it in the world, he just might have a better time surviving than someone who is simply strong physically. Someone who is neither strong nor smart, but just a really fast runner, might survive longer than anyone.
But if we're talking about social Darwinism, then no. The strongest should not always survive. Things are a little more complicated than that.
2006-09-10 18:29:27 · answer #2 · answered by The Ry-Guy 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nature or however God is did no longer something. they are excuses. once you're a vegetarian then I propose you initiate utilising your ideas and look on the fact of issues. I propose, only basing your interest on a "factor" equipment for public opinion limits others' interpretation, to no longer point out your guy or woman. each and every little thing that lives, dies. Why is that no longer a factor equipment? Animals are no longer the only issues that grow to be pray, neither are people. flowers do, in fires, storms and human plucking. timber help all issues that stay breathe, yet we shrink them right down to make properties and build hearth for heat temperature. And while it comes right down to susceptible and powerful, look on the rattling snakes, they are able to swallow an entire goat, a creature that could kill them by way of only stepping on them. Spiders frieghten the **** out us people, and we are over 900% their top. If I have been you, i does not situation approximately some thing like this. What does it accompolish? It tries to make one human's opinion weaker than yet another. It does no longer something in any respect.
2016-12-15 05:53:09 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The smartest is the strongest.
2006-09-11 12:20:11 · answer #4 · answered by alex 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Thats the way nature works. Think about that. the smartest animal in the planet is the human. Hence, why we are the dominant species.
2006-09-10 18:16:16 · answer #5 · answered by Aramis Jack 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The strongest is the right application for the given task at hand and If u aask me it is going to be the one that comes up with the best plan to do what needs to be done and has the best outcome.
2006-09-10 16:58:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Man cannot morally dictate who should/shouldn't survive. The Nazis tried that, and thankfully, the world revolted against them. They used to put mentally infirm people in death camps. They even had a special badge they had to wear (like the jews). The same thing went for homosexuals.
2006-09-10 16:47:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is called "natural selection". The survival of our race would be in jeopardy if only the weak survived.
2006-09-14 15:08:43 · answer #8 · answered by randyrich 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends what you mean by strong. I know strong men who are afraid of water or afraid of flying.Strength is useful in some situations but often useless without intelligence. It was probably somebody who wasn't strong enough to move something who invented the wheel. In fact most of the progress of mankind has been due to finding solutions to problems for which we don't have enough strength.
2006-09-10 18:00:21 · answer #9 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The SMARTEST of the STRONG will always survive...
2006-09-10 16:46:32 · answer #10 · answered by R J 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋