President Bush?

Question

How many of you think that whatever President Bush is doing in Iraq and other parts of the world legimate and right way to fight terrorism? What do you think abt his involvment in SEP 11 attacks...do u believe he knew it? and last thing I want to know how many of you support him in whatver he is doing? his policies?

Answer 1

all this think abt iraq is messed up cuz it makes no sense. i dont see the reason for him to be killing so many ppl there muslims and american soldiers. and for here in america we dont even have enough military ppl to tackle domestic problems or need in emergency as in katrina in 2005. if u knew more abt katrina the reason so many ppl cudnt be helped is cuz the gov had shortage of help ( military ppl and rescue ) cuz most of them have been send to iraq
i think instead of bothering other countries he shud concentrate on his own cuz he is not iraq's president. i think he shud leave them alone. so many americans have already been killed. this isnt fair with ne body. he is less likely protecting the country but instead making it more likely for another attack. cuz he still havemt caught osama bin laden who is the master mind behind all this
i think bush needs to start thinking wisely.

Answer 2

I do not support all of GW's policies. For example, his policies on illegal immigration. I think what he is doing in Iraq is legitimate but I think mistakes have been made. I do not know if it is the right way to fight terrorism and not too many people in this world know that simply because we have never had to fight terrorism before. What involvement did GW have in the 9-11 attacks? Proof please? No, I do not think he knew it until he was told in the classroom. I support GW. Who do you support. There are two sides in this war on terrorism, GW and the terrorists. Do you support the terrorists? If you do, should you not be questioning some of the things they are doing like indiscriminately killing innocent civilians, forcing individuals to accept the Muslim religion, cutting prisoners heads off on TV and other outrages? GWs economic policies have been very successful. He made a mistake in not acting fast enough after Katrina struck, but it was an honest one. Your question seemed an honest one so I tried answering it honestly. I hope you see the relevance to your question.

Answer 3

I support his policy on fighting terrorism with the exception of who he controls our borders. No I do not think he knew about the 9/11 attach in advance. I do not think things have gone well in Iraq but I don't know that not going into war there would have produced more favorable results.

Answer 4

I don't think that Bush knew what was happening. Look at his reaction when he is reading to the children, he is stunned. Even Michael Moore commented on this.

Iraq was a legitemate target. The first Gulf War hasn't really ended. Iraqi forces shot at members of the US and UK Air Forces routinely as they patroled the "no-fly" zones in Operations Northern and Southern Watch. President Bush had to rely on reports from the DCI (director of central intelligence) to make his decisions. There are often conflicting intel reports and it is up to the DCI to interpert them and present his conclusions to the president. Clinton bombed that asprin factory in the Sudan based on faulty intelligence, but he didn't twist the facts to allow an attack, and neither did Bush.

Al-Zarqawi certainly conducted a lot of al-Qaeda operations out of Iraq, but whether Saddam had direct ties is debatable, but he definately knew that he was there and left him alone. Currently there are lots of terrorists pouring into Iraq to fight US and allied forces. We are fighting them over there as opposed to at home. I support most of his decisions.

Answer 5

I think his involvement is a bunch of crappy conspiracy theory garbage. However, I don't really have a strong opion either way about the war, because I don't really think anyone really knows what's going on over there, so I HATE when people call Bush an idiot just because they say this war is pointless and whatever else about stuff they don't know.

Answer 6

I think he's an idiot. Don't worry, I'm not that biased... I thought Clinton was an idiot as well.

Frankly, I doubt he knew about the attacks. That's just a stupid conspiracy theory.

As for Iraq. Yeah, Saddam sucks but he wasn't a threat to us. He just sucked up more power from finding Bin Laden. Whom we never caught.. if u remember. We found the leader of a country and called it a victory... but never found the leader of a terrorist organization (the one that lead the group that you know... killed thousands of people on sept. 11.... oh yeah.. that WASN'T SADDAM)

His policies domestically... I could see someone supporting... Abortion and such.

But his foreign policy sucks.

Answer 7

I support Bush all the way. I think what he is doing in the middle east is justified. I don't think that he knew about the attacks. I fully support President Bush.

Answer 8

In Iraq, why....Iraq has became a breeding ground for terrorists now....at least when saddam was in power, we knew that he, and his sons would be the only terrorists there. now its open season there.....i believe that we should have finished the job in afganistan....we toppled Al-Qaeda only to have them to rebuild this quickly....mistake, get the real terrorist osama. and his policies.....i thought republicans mean less spending....we are spending so much that china is buying up over debt, that we will all be speaking chinese before it is over with.

Answer 9

i think he should have attacked afghanistan but stayed out of iraq as far as terrorism goes.

as far as oil goes, we needed to do it. in just 50 years oil will no longer be widely available enough to completely power world economies like it is today, which is why gas prices have shot up the last couple years, because demand is starting to outpace supply. we arent ready to switch over to something else yet and iraq is virtually untapped, and now weve stabalized the region to buy us more time. oh yeah, and we brought "democracy"

Answer 10

Basing in the premise that terrorism can be eradicated is just the start of being wrong. Unless you plan to make people loose all their freedom globally which is impossible.