Venice Italy or Rome Italy. Could you also tell me why you chose it because if you just say "Rome", "Venice", or "Neither" it doensn't help me much. Thanks for the answers!
2006-09-10 13:33:28 · 18 answers · asked by Led*Zep*Babe 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I would like to be in both cities. In Venice they have some very interesting architecture they developed to deal with the canals that are full of water. I cannot imagine living that near the water all the time. I would like to be in Rome because of the art and the center of the Catholic Church and to meet the pope.
2006-09-10 13:39:02 · answer #1 · answered by mom of girls 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good question, I've been to Venice and it is amazing and I would live there in a heartbeat, but since I haven't been to Rome I can't really choose between the two but I know that venice is definatly worth living in.
It's different than other cities I've been to, I really like the street painting and st. marcs square but most of all I loved how you can get lost in the little side streets and canals and then find a beautiful little place no one else knows of.
2006-09-10 20:40:17 · answer #2 · answered by Gwennan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rome. I get a little clausterphobic in Venice with all of the narrow corridors and few open areas that is not covered with water. Rome is more international and has a lot of history, too. (Just keep your eye out for those scooters! Some of them are crazy drivers!)
2006-09-12 10:38:34 · answer #3 · answered by borscht 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ive been to both. i would choose venice, its more exciting from my personal view. im here for the excitement than the pleasure. rome is huge and expanded, venice is small and compact. i love small towns, small areas, i live in florence for that. plus venice is full of little surprises little stores here and there little passages, rome is just a huge industrial city full of history and art and nothing else. venice is unique, how many other towns in all of europe is similar to venice? how many towns in all of europe is similar to rome? (i mean not couting the monuments) im sure there must be at least one.
thats why i choose venice.
2006-09-11 07:08:14 · answer #4 · answered by sueet2b 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could I live in Rome for a year, then move to Venice? I really can't decide -- would like to be in both for various reasons, cultural exploration being one.
2006-09-10 20:40:11 · answer #5 · answered by Lonnie P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well venice is sooo beautiful BUT its alllll tourists...so u dont really get the amount of culture that you would in rome..u can travel a lil outside of the city but ROME is like the most italian place to go.. one minute ur walking down a busy metro type street, the next ur on cobblestone watching lil old italian ladies hang clothes out of the window....its a toughie...UR LUCKY i love italy..id live anywhere for a year..but id say if u have a year..do ROME..u can see and do more, learn more, go to the vatican instead of reagular church lol...plus its easier to get to more places from there...more city like...have fun good luck
2006-09-10 20:39:55 · answer #6 · answered by thatgirluknow 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rome
2006-09-10 20:38:48 · answer #7 · answered by Ty 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd have to go for Venice, because of the sheer uniqueness of the city.And Rome,while beautiful, is too catholic, and back in the day, they used to burn people like me, so I'd tend to steer clear.
2006-09-10 20:42:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would live in Rome in order to enjoy all the great art and culture.
2006-09-10 20:39:35 · answer #9 · answered by nido_tr3s 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather live in Rome due to the culture and the lack of flooding.
2006-09-10 20:36:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋