Give proof/links etc.
2006-09-10 11:25:41 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
OMG give it a rest will you. Daaaaamn anyway.
You know what, they haven't found the center of the earth either.... But I have a sneaking suspicion that it still exists.
2006-09-10 11:30:02 · answer #1 · answered by USMCstingray 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
possibly because Bush admitted there have been no WMD in Iraq. Then Bush went on television and made jokes about they might want to be available someplace. This replaced into throughout the time of a White homestead dinner and over 4 thousand troops died and Bush is making jokes. The CIA suggested Bush 3 days before he attacked Iraq they couldn't discover any WMD. possibly Wikileaks isn't so properly suggested on the data.
2016-11-26 00:09:12 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cheney admitted today that there weren't WMDs in Iraq.
This is from the MSNBC website - it's an article on Cheney's appearance today on Meet The Press.
"In the build-up to the U.S. invasion in 2003, Bush and other administration leaders argued that Saddam should be removed from power because he had stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and was actively seeking to build a nuclear weapon.
Subsequent investigations concluded that he did not have such weapons, and in an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Cheney acknowledged that, “clearly, the intelligence that said he did was wrong.”"
2006-09-10 11:33:05 · answer #3 · answered by TxSup 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he claimed that he was presented with false information. In other words he managed to blame others for his blunder rather than admitting that he lied so he could have an excuse to send troops to Iraq. He wanted the glory of being the president who took down Saddam, not matter what the cost. I would have more respect for him if he had just said that Saddam was an evil person who killed innocent people and needed to be taken care of, which was the truth. But instead of doing that he invented a reason to go there.
2006-09-10 11:33:15 · answer #4 · answered by nimo22 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Here's a whole page of links to Bush ADMITTING there were NO
wmd in Iraq....
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=bush+admits+no+wmd&fr=yfp-t-500&toggle=1&cop=&ei=UTF-8
2006-09-10 11:32:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
OAK RIDGE — President Bush delivered a 35-minute talk today that defended the administration's campaign against terror in the Mideast and elsewhere.
"Although we have not found stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction, we were right to go into Iraq," he said.
2006-09-10 11:42:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he didnt. He said they havent found any and they gave up looking 4 them but he'll never say their were never any there. Thats basically admitting the whole war was initiated under false/incorrect info.
2006-09-10 11:32:00 · answer #7 · answered by rolla_jay510 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
http://freepress2005.blogspot.com/2005/01/comparison-of-bush-administration.html
thats us officials comments before and after the war.
2006-09-10 12:37:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There were. You can't prove a negative so how can you prove something was NOT there.
2006-09-10 11:28:43 · answer #9 · answered by Barkley Hound 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
no
2006-09-10 11:31:24 · answer #10 · answered by ang 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋