English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

By sheer numbers Hiroshima. But that was war.

9/11 was a sneak attack by cowards.

2006-09-10 10:58:09 · answer #1 · answered by Robb 5 · 1 1

As with any attack or act of war both were horrible.

In Hiroshima 80,000 people were killed and 80% of the city was destroyed. I think that makes it worse than 9/11.

2006-09-10 10:54:02 · answer #2 · answered by Livia 2 · 1 0

September 11th, 2001 because it was on home ground and we loss a piece of the new york skyline that will never be replaced and that so many people died that could have be pervented IF cliton would have done his job.

2006-09-11 12:12:02 · answer #3 · answered by neakblue 2 · 0 0

RE Whitney H:

more people were killed on 9/11 than in the Hiroshima bombings!?!??

haha you fool! less than 3,000 people were killed on 9/11, over 80,000 were killed instantly by 'Little Boy' (the atom bomb dropped on Hiroshima) and a further 60,000 died later from injuries and nuclear fall-out.

which was worse? 3,000 deaths or 140,000 deaths. you decide.

ironic that one was done by the USA and the other done to the USA...

2006-09-10 10:57:31 · answer #4 · answered by ministe2003 3 · 0 0

i would say 9/11, cuz hiroshima ended the war, saving many people's lives that might've died the next day or year fighting, but 9/11 started a war, cauzing more people to die in the future.

2006-09-10 10:58:27 · answer #5 · answered by Danny 2 · 0 0

Hiroshima - firstly, we killed 10 times as many as died on 9/11.

Secondly - we're supposed to know better.

2006-09-10 10:54:17 · answer #6 · answered by dryheatdave 6 · 0 0

I'm pretty sure that hiroshima was wasn't it? not only did it kill thousands more, it also kills hundreds more each year from the radiation the a-bomb caused, and that ground will now always be radioactive. so i think hiroshima is worse.

2006-09-10 10:59:09 · answer #7 · answered by piano_man_969 2 · 0 0

Hiroshima was worse. It's one (terrible) thing for terrorists to kill innocent civilians, but it's entirely another for a government that outwardly condemns killing civilians to incinerate an entire city.

2006-09-10 10:55:11 · answer #8 · answered by TOB 3 · 0 0

These events cannot really be compared. Whenever there is loss of live through catastrophic events, the outcome is never good.

2006-09-10 10:56:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

More people were killed during September 11th. Though the atomic bomb gave people at Hiroshima leukemia, September 11th was more tragic...

2006-09-10 10:50:30 · answer #10 · answered by : ) 4 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers