Over 60% of the U.S. now believes that Bush & Co. lied to get us into Iraq. From there the question is...?

Question

If the vast majority of the U.S. indeed believes they lied, does it take Sherlock Holmes to make a case for treason, murder, torture, illegal and immoral war crimes against a sovereign nation, stealing and hiding at least 9 BILLION DOLLARS of unaccounted money that has supposedly gone to the war effort, criminal and immoral profiteering by Halliburton and other companies close to the Bush Crime Family??! Why the fluck are we dragging our toes on this one, folks?! Are we going to continue to be as blind as the Germans were when Hitler was in power??!! What's it going to take for us to stand up to the madman and his madness??!!

Answer 1

they control our government,, Fascist Republicans,,, the voters have to change the control on November 7th.....

Answer 2

Stupid pinko commie liberal, the Dem's in Congress had the same intelligent info as President Bush had, they went over they same reports given them by the CIA, FBI, and the intelligent agencies from other Nations, France, Britain, can't remember the rest. All the Democrats agreed on what needed to be done. Kerry said Saddam had WMD's. So if Bush is a liar so are your Dem buddies. But they don't have the guts to admit it, so everything is Bushes fault. History will show that Clinton was to busy getting his nob polished to pay attention, to all the attacks on the United States, that happened during his watch. All Clinton did was lob a couple of missles and hit a camel in the a*s.

Answer 3

It seems that , although every one knows , they are at a loss as what to do about it . The Republicans don't want to do anything ,because he's in their party and they will look stupid and the Democrats are not the majority , the can't do anything , yet , until they know how the American people feel about voting them in office . They got their hands dirty too , by going along with Bush on Iraq .
No body stood up to him and asked the heard questions , no body !
The media is to blam too .
A lot of Americans asked , but were called unpatriotic so most shut up .
Now we find out , what we were thinking , is true .
So the question is , what do we want to do about it .......? Can we ever believe what Bush says is true ????????

Answer 4

Man , are you ever picky. But I do agree with you, I said you are picky, I didn't say I wasn't.
As for estimated date of withdrawal, 12th of never. A major reason is Iraq's desire to go off the US$ and go on the Euro, as has Iran, Venezuala and I'm sure Bolivia. Over 30 years ago "OPEC" decided the US$ would be the only currency permitted in oil dealings. e.g Mexico buys oil from China US$s, you get the drift.
It seems this little arrangment has kept the US$ artificially high, floating on oil as it were. The US is constructing 14 bases in Iraq. Why build permanant homes if you are just there for a visit. It might even be considered a mashalling area should hostilities break out with , maybe Iran. Another thing your government has encouraged is the selling off of US jobs to ,say China, who is investing very heavily on Wall Street. This is putting the US on very shackey ground. This scares the hell out of me, because Our spanking new Prime Minister has his head stuck so far up.Bush's a**.............Let's just say they are wearing the same necktie. We have a Minority government, so hopefully it won't be to long before the House is brought down. It also looks like Tony Blair is finished, so hopefully things will come to a quick head before the Neo-Cons do any more damage to your country filling their pockets at taxpayers expense, but more important before any more American young people die for those Bast**ds. Good luck

Answer 5

That is what that $9 billion is being used for. Let's see what happens after the next 2 elections. Republicans still have control, so nothing CAN be done. One step at a time. Be sure to make it to the ballot box and take as many with you as you can. If you are able, volunteer with some organization that is dedicated to getting the vote out. People can be prosecuted even after they are out of office. Until the Dems take control, be patient.

Answer 6

Whether he lied or not, the decision was not his alone, Congress authorized the use of force. With their authorization they are also to blame for any "lies" Besides, I believe that the real underlying cause of the war in Iraq was to provide a democracy in the middle east and a base from which the US and the new democratic Iraq could stand up to Iranian influence in the middle east. However by destabilizing the country and not being quick enough to rout the insurrection I think the US govt has actually given Iran more of a foothold in that region. Here's an interesting postulation--Sadaam Hussein could have been our greatest ally in a much larger war against Iran-whether a war of military might or a PR war for the minds and hearts of the middle east. Something to think about...but as far as convicting Bush of war crimes that can never happen. The majority of Congress, regardless of party affliliation, voted for the authorization of force in Iraq, and for all the political grandstanding and condemnation that you hear from the DNC regarding Iraq, they have never introduced any meaningful resolution into Congress condemning the war or calling for a definite date to end the war or anything-the majority of the DNC's opposition to the war happens in front of microphones and cameras on sunday morning or cable news programs-NOT on the floor of the Senate or House chamber. If they were truly against the war in Iraq they would have tried to push through some meaningful resolution on the subject, regardless of whether it would get voted against or not, it would be symbolic, but it hasn't happened.

Answer 7

Oddly sufficient, in case you particularly think of W lied approximately WMD's. so did Hillary and a million/2 the Democrats in Congress at that factor. Now her and her boss are asserting they're conserving themselves to blame for Benghazi after which wish the subject is going away. the canopy up assessment could ought to be made against NIXON. a pair of bungling burglars getting caught with the help of a janitor replaced into rather no longer certainly one of those undesirable element, it replaced into the Nixon administration that attempted to cover it up that replaced into the rationalization for him to provide up. i individually have faith the marketing campaign supervisor, David Axlerod had a hand to play interior the canopy as much as shield Obama.

Answer 8

Bush has not lied to us fellow americans and he is not a madman remember that also that the majority of the 60% percent voted him in, the only thing he is doing is making big problems out of small ones the sooner he gets out of power the better.

Answer 9

He won't be held accountable for a damn thing that he's done. Not now, not in 10 years, 20 years, 50 years. As far as the Conservatives are concerned, he isn't guilty. In fact, he can do no wrong. With that said, them and his friends in high places will do whatever they can to keep him out of harms way. Yet Clinton is impeached for cheating on his wife, who Conservatives don't even like in the first place, by the way. Makes no sense, whatsoever.

Answer 10

Becuase all you have is half truths and lies, and everyone knows it.

We went to war because both democrats and republicians voted to do so in Congress as a responce to the American public outcray to "get someone for this"

we picked the nation we though we could beat the easiest and one where the other nations would not really care if we did.

Answer 11

Ok, so you say 60% of people 'believe' he lied. Can you freaking show me a lie he told? My God, people, just because you keep repeating he lied, does not mean he lied:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ak_Co_EEffuZyOuNbT5mAQHsy6IX?qid=20060908161715AAGtMWc


Do you want to impeach bush for this also (before he was in office):

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.