Would implanting every new born child with a micro chip, cut down future crime?

Question

Or would taking D.N.A samples from the new born to Pensioners - 65plus - solve the UKs crime levels?

Answer 1

Responsible parenthood could cut down future crime

But that´s too hard, go ahead with the chips.

Answer 2

I think planting a microchip in every new born child is a bit too extreme and is not practical at all.

However, I do think that taking every new born should be asked for a DNA sample, as long as the government agree that it would only be used for crime purposes and not for statistical or market research purposes.

If there are not limits as to what the government can do with it then it should not be done.

With the government doing anything to make money these days, I wouldn't be surprised if they did sell on this information and the consequences could prove catastrophic.

As well as your own scientific views, it also depends on your political mind and what wing you tend to follow (Left/right)

I hope that this gives you a balanced answer without too much bias!

Answer 3

I was only talking about this the other day.

I agree that DNA should be taken at birth. People can always cut a chip out or alter it.

I'm of the opinion, if you have nothing to hide then you don't mind your DNA on file.

I think it would help with crime as you know who has done the crime and then all you have to do is find the person!

Answer 4

Sure help you find them if they were lost.
We do it for our dogs and now cats are getting them in the USA.
Race horses all have computer chips. They can't be stolden that way and they are easy to recover. One dentist said lets put a chip in a tooth filling. For a back permanent tooth.
If a child gets stolden kidnapped it would send out a signal and you could find them again. Save a few lives. They do it for animals. Some people I've heard do it for their children but very few. Just didn't catch on that good.

Answer 5

Wow! Lot of dumb stuff in a small area yet enable me attempt to furnish you a reaction. a million) Administering the death penalty technique is approximately 600% extra high priced than life imprisonment. 2) inner maximum prisons, like public ones, are a hundred% funded with taxpayer money. there is not any different source of investment of direction. 3) The death penalty isn't long previous so it rather is going to likely be stressful to deliver it back. 32 states, the U. S. government and the U. S. protection stress all have the death penalty. 18 states and the District of Columbia do no longer. Did you thoroughly pass 4th grade?

Answer 6

Better technology and less personal invasion would be a better route. Slowly the government through are children are teaching them the thinking and the knowledge they want them to know. They do not want people to use their minds. They want them to depend on programs to do it for them. Shame isn't it. No all the chips and DNA would provide is a controlling device and tracking device to the individual. Just my opinion.:-)

Answer 7

Yes every human should be catalogued and saved on huge data base it would cut down on crime like u said and sort this immigration mess out

Answer 8

In Au every new born has this done already...its all stored in Canberra ACT (blood sample that is ) no it will not solve crime

Answer 9

First of all our Bodies are the Temple of the Holy Spirit, and nothing like the microchip or anything foreign or not given by GOD our Saviour is to be put in our bodies.

The microchips can control us, as their are electromagnetic fields, and guide us in the wrong direction, and would track our wherabouts everywhere even if you are good.

As People and Catholics we are SUPPOSED TO REJECT THE MICROCHIP AS THAT IS THE SIGN OF satan the beast and his adversaries, and they want exclusive control. It is better to fight for your religion that to accept the mark of the prince of darkness.

Answer 10

Go back to the old ways, send miscreants off to Australia and let the Aborigines run the prisons.