Darwin's theory has been used to justify the kill-or-be-killed mentality of life being not much more that a "survival of the fittest." My question is this: When you see people supporting war and the obvious murdering of people through war, does this provide evidence that Darwin is right and life for HUMAN BEINGS (not talking about animals here) is no greater than a survival of the fittest?
2006-09-10
06:56:16
·
7 answers
·
asked by
What I Say
3
in
Social Science
➔ Other - Social Science
Chell C: Humans are animals? I guess you've never heard of the neocortex.
2006-09-10
07:10:56 ·
update #1