Art, in all its forms, is a reflection of what "it" has made us. Artists aren't trying to do this, they are just a product of their time. The summary isn't quite how I would put it. I would replace religion with philosophy.
2006-09-10 05:39:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sketch 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Art shows how futile and weak are the attempts of Science and religion to put forth the truth through LOGIC !
Art is based on intuition, and hence wins effortlessly !
2006-09-11 09:45:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spiritualseeker 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Art describes what the artist is thinking.
2006-09-10 12:41:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by gregory_dittman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm, art can visually describe science and religion, math and mythology
art can combine all to conceal many stories in one picture ;)
2006-09-10 12:33:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by WW 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it makes sense, I think you're right: art "describes" , as it tells a story
2006-09-10 12:37:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is clever but incomplete. Art is an opinion..
2006-09-10 16:53:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sophist 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i disagree about the religion part
2006-09-10 13:03:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋