Here's the evidence I have for this:
1-Up to Oct 05, Katie was very pregnant, in Dec 05, the bump seemed to vanish, only to magically reappear again in Apr 06, just before the supposed birth (photos support this). What happened here?
2- Birth Certificate made 10 days after birth, why?
3- No one has seen Suri until now. why?
4- Pics of Suri that have been released make the kid look to be about 8 to 9 months old instead of 5 to 6 as the age should be.
Supporting facts:
1- All of Tom's other kids are adopted, why not one more?
2- Rumors of Tom being gay (I refer you to an online web video "YAAFM-Scientologist" by ZipperFish.com)
So the big question is: Is baby Suri adopted? I certainly think so, esp since the pics that I've seen thus far make me think that the child is asian. Your thoughts on this?
2006-09-10 02:37:51 · 27 answers · asked by deltajester 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
2 pts
2006-09-10 02:38:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Suri Cruise Birth Certificate
2016-11-08 02:18:51 · answer #2 · answered by sachiko 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Suri's mom is Katie holmes but her father is not tom because he has never had kids of his own before suri with his other wives. Why would it suddnely change. I think an unknown sperm donor is her father. Then again it could be a sciencetologist spproved donation making Suri the successor to the founder of sciencetology. LOL
2006-09-10 04:40:50 · answer #3 · answered by carpau0 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well there are a great deal of asian baby girls that need homes. A pregancy can be faked easily especially by someone in holywood. Tom has no swimers. Could be true. Or it could be that Katie had the baby fathered from another man.
2006-09-14 00:47:43 · answer #4 · answered by adobeprincess 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The kid does not look Asian. Tom has two other adopted kids, why would he lie about "this" one being adopted if she were? As for her size, you should have seen my first born when he was little! He always looked MUCH bigger than he was.... actually, he still does! Bottom line........... why does anyone care? She looks like a very healthy baby and has a family who appear to love her very much! I'd say, she's pretty lucky.
mb
2006-09-10 04:11:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually had that same thought myself since a so called celebrity couple have a baby (loony religious cult or not) are so desperate for the attention they grab every photo opportunity they can so the fact it has took so long says there is something dodgy
2006-09-10 06:12:22 · answer #6 · answered by sadistic_bondagelover 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would they lie about "having" a kid? Tom may be a bit loopy but he's no Michael Jackson. If he says the child is biologically his, I believe him. Besides, poor Katie was very preggars. So to answer you question...NO she is not adopted.
2006-09-10 03:05:53 · answer #7 · answered by Nuseed 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who cares?
When an actor starts highlighting his personal life rather than his career it's a bad sign...for his career, and when the public starts getting more interested in those kind of facts and not his body of work...worse...watch out for the Michael Jackson Syndrome
2006-09-10 04:22:38 · answer #8 · answered by Eduardo L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That remains a big mystery.. maybe they let another man similar to tom cruise' features impregnate her through artificial insemination.
2006-09-10 03:55:34 · answer #9 · answered by 99CLOUD99 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 pts
2006-09-10 02:43:48 · answer #10 · answered by hope v 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋