and for a moment or two you had the power to choose between two options, only two, and the choice was to either kill the enemy or cripple them for life, what would you choose?
2006-09-10 00:34:54 · 10 answers · asked by Bluebellofthefog 1 in Social Science ➔ Anthropology
If crippling were enough to prevent any future attacks, I'd be for that. Otherwise, I think you'd have to kill them.
2006-09-10 00:36:39 · answer #1 · answered by Joe Rockhead 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kill, then I don't have to care for a cripple and possible family. Less trouble in the future.
2006-09-10 01:04:58 · answer #2 · answered by thebushman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tough choice...
Probably cripple...
2006-09-10 02:15:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cripple .... if there are more enemies in the area they will need to use reserves to look after him .... giving you more of a chance
2006-09-10 00:43:13 · answer #4 · answered by Gandalf 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
See how your first option goes over with the all of the countless productive wheelchair bound citizens of the world. Alive with their familys.
2006-09-12 00:29:40 · answer #5 · answered by voncaros 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Killing is more mercyful that crippling for life, whatever you think God 's opinion is.
Trust me.
2006-09-10 00:41:15 · answer #6 · answered by savs 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do not consider my self a cruel person. a cruel person cripples another for life.
2006-09-11 07:22:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cripple for sure..want him to live with the consequences.
2006-09-10 00:40:48 · answer #8 · answered by Roxy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would kill, I wouldn't want him coming back for revenge or make him suffer for rest of his life
2006-09-10 00:37:47 · answer #9 · answered by milton1007 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Self defence is not murder.
I would defend myself to the last of my breath...
2006-09-10 04:51:09 · answer #10 · answered by sea princess 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋