Is it not true that antonym of Black Hole exhibits similiar optical/visual illusions?
2006-09-09 23:36:08 · 13 answers · asked by orsel 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Light may not pass I suppose becouse black hole attract and absorb light but its antonym may repel light light back.
2006-09-10 00:15:05 · update #1
And suppose it doesnot reflect back and neither absorb the light but rather destroy it at a significant distance away from its existence.
2006-09-15 01:10:44 · update #2
The answer is much wider than people seem to think.
Quickly off the top of my head while I cook dinner:
1) A black hole can produce radiation (Hawking radiation), for a start, therefore its opposite would have to absorb some. Anti-gravity very bright star thingy, maybe? Or maybe all the stars in a galaxy, except they still produce gravity. I'll think a bit more.
2) Philosophically, one might liken a black hole to 'darkness', thus its opposite would be 'light (God?)". One cannot exist without the other, etc.
It may be something they discover when the new machine gets built at CERN!
2006-09-12 06:22:19 · answer #1 · answered by fruitbat7711 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you're suggesting is an object with a massive force of anti-gravity.
In basic terms, a black hole is exactly the same as any other matter in the universe, except that it's much more dense, and this density is why it has such a massive gravity. A black hole looks black because it affects light in such a way that even light is pulled towards it.
An anti black hole would act as a sort of mirror, and light going roughly towards it be bent away from the object. It would also keep moving until it found a position in space where all forces of gravity were equally balanced. We wouldn't be able to observe it easily. If there was no light behind us, from a distance we would see a large area of nothing. Just black. If there was light behind us, it's possible that some of the light would be reflected towards us and we'd just see light from stars or whatever was around.
In finding an object like this, you'd also find something that might contradict some of the laws of physics, and it asks FAR more questions than it answers. Could it be the only indestructible thing in the universe? If nothing can get close enough to destroy it, how can it be destroyed? How would it actually exist without tearing itself apart? The list is endless...
2006-09-10 01:57:45 · answer #2 · answered by mybrownpolarbear 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Colour means kind of light that an eye can detect.Light is electromagnetic radiation identical as f.i. x-rays.What is the colour of an x-ray ?BTW you are a genius.Whilst many researchers are puzzled by Black Holes,you are already studying Anti Black Holes.Congratulations !
2006-09-17 21:02:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well...black hole is just a region which doesnt even let light partilces escape its gravity. its not visible no matter how much light you throw on it. you can say a worm hole is an opposite situation...a situation of anti gravity..how would it look like? i dont know..but in that region you travel faster than light..so perhaps due to the doppler effect, you can see various color aberrations shifts from red to blue and so on..
2006-09-09 23:42:14 · answer #4 · answered by sunthinks 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bright white light
2006-09-09 23:41:39 · answer #5 · answered by witchfromoz2003 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Empty space, Zero gravity, light can pass through, that's the best opposite I can think of.
2006-09-10 00:00:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
White holes?
2006-09-14 10:48:01 · answer #7 · answered by bo nidle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they haven't yet found evidence of the opposite. logic would dictate though that it would be opposite in all aspects to a black hole
2006-09-09 23:42:58 · answer #8 · answered by iamalsotim 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
love is opposite to black hole. try and find its colour, and special characteristics within yourself.
2006-09-09 23:52:36 · answer #9 · answered by vijay4118 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the white cage
2006-09-09 23:41:48 · answer #10 · answered by cassey s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋