I don't agree that all are - there may be a minority who are not. I haven't met them yet, but it's very possible.
But a friend of mine thinks that they are if they go for it, even in a free country. He thinks the time is past when people had good reason to join the army.
I'm younger & have never felt so broke or isolated that I should apply. Is he right to think that most army applicants have little to lose by taking a military job, and no other respected option in civil life? Do only those who have the respect of civil or rich or self-important politicians progress thru' the hierarchy?
Get angry & you'll prove his point - I'd like to suggest to him that it might not be the case, for reasons you might suggest. Right now, how can I argue? I only know seven people, who would only prove his point, and ten people living who are not convinced by his theory but can't prove him wrong. I'm curious.
2006-09-09
19:08:53
·
7 answers
·
asked by
WomanWhoReads
5
in
Social Science
➔ Other - Social Science
Please, before you answer, could you honestly consider what their parents or guardians are like?
2006-09-09
19:10:14 ·
update #1
I do think it's sad that the civilian grants are less than the military ones, to afford people the educational opportunities.
2006-09-11
10:38:33 ·
update #2