The Irish were the first to use terror tactics. They drove the Brits out of the south.
2006-09-09 17:49:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by thart090 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Let's see: Aum Shinrikyo's nerve gassing of the subway in Japan, The Irish Republican Army, The Ulster Liberation Front, The Aryan Nations raids around the country, the Symbionese Liberation Army, the Weather Underground, Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing, the Unibomber, the guards at Abu Gharaib, the British private security contractors that shot vehicles behind them on the highway in Baghdad for sport, the men who launched the Iraq invasion on phony pretext...nope. You sure don't have to be Moslems.
2006-09-09 17:48:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
What is a terrorist anyway? It comes back to the oft repeated statement that one person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter. If you look at government definitions of terrorism, you will find that what is being done in iraq actually amounts to an act of terrorism. See Noam Chomsky 'Who are the Global Terrorists?' Also, if you want to look at a great overview of past and present terrorism, see James M. Lutz and Brenda J. Lutz 'Global Terrorism'. You will find there are many terrorists, and terrorist organisations in the world that are not Muslim. So no, it is not the case that only Muslims can be terrorists.
2006-09-09 17:51:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by scattergrl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. The violence committed against Muslims is always righteous. That's the way the world works. Islam is evil. Jews and Christians are all without sin.
I also think that Dubbaya is highly evolved and the Einstein of his day. Codoleeza is a gentle loving woman. rumsfeld is highly capable and has made no mistakes in running the war. Iraqis welcome American aggression and bombs. Palestinians look forward to the missiles that land in their living rooms.
Shedding the blood of Arabs/Muslims is a small price to pay to help the people involved with Halliburton get even richer.
Why do you even bother asking such a question?
PS. In truth I despise US and Israeli aggression
Now, another swig of my cheap wine.
2006-09-09 17:48:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Are you worried that terrorists are getting a bad name? Were any of your videos of the 9-11 hijackings? How about some suicide bombings, a train bombing? You know the religion in whose name the terrorists act. Your reaction should be to condemn them, not to tell us not to recognize the obvious, that the major terrorist acts and organization today are Muslim. Are they muslim in name only and not true Muslims? That's for you to sort out. The rest of us see what we see.
2006-09-09 17:50:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by mattapan26 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO!! a terrorist is anyone who is plotting an attack or a vicious act against a person or people that is not in agreements with their beliefs, race,religion or culture. A list of terrorist : abortion activist,gay bashing, gang bangers,a racist , a rapist and anyone who threatens the well being of any other person verbal or physical.
2006-09-09 18:00:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by handicute2 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Apart from Muslims, there has been Christian terrorists groups, Sikh terrorists groups and also Nationalist terrorists groups. The website below lists all the known terrorists groups.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist_groups
2006-09-09 17:46:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by carpau0 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Of course not. Terrorism has existed for a long time. There was a big terrorist problem in Germany for example - and it was German people against other Germans. It's a political, ideological thing, not a race, religion thing.
2006-09-09 17:45:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stephanie 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nope
2006-09-09 17:42:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by retrodragonfly 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Remember Timothy McVeigh?
2006-09-09 17:42:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cat Loves Her Sabres 6
·
0⤊
1⤋