Ok so ive been asking questions to see peoples response to danger when the one guy is either physically more powerful or better armed. To sum it up i find it interesting that most responses revolved around either killing the other or rendering them unable to fight. So how is it when Israel being more heavily armed then Hezbollah. Israel are considered the agressors and the ones that need to stop the agression towards Hezbollah because hezbollah being of a weaker stature can not directly confront Israeli Army and end up hiding in towns and Cities within population centers to fire rockets at Israel? Isael is all of a sudden not allowed to use their bigger bombs? And is it not the fault of Hezbollah that citizens are in the way since that is where they choose to fight?
2006-09-09
13:16:02
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality