Why would you, based on available evidence that, at the very least, he had prior knowledge of 9/11?
2006-09-09 07:06:59 · 40 answers · asked by InternetPosterChild 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Family
How about sending your son or daughter into war to defend the United States Constitution from tyranny? Would you do that? And NO, that is NOT what is happening right now. Right now they are fighting FOR one man, not for the Constitution or to protect us from anything.
2006-09-09 07:11:38 · update #1
Sorry folks who think you can run to Canada for amnesty. If Bush gets his way, Canada will be a part of the new North American Region in the New World Order. That means there is no escaping service to the EVIL-DOERS.
If there ever is a draft and this type of illegal and immoral war is going on, it will be over my dead body before my children are taken and forced to serve Satin-type leaders. And I imagine my feelings are echoed enough to become a real problem for those people who think like Bush and his bosses.
2006-09-09 07:17:05 · update #2
When George Bush sends his two daughters to Iraq to fight his war, so the answer is noway.
2006-09-09 09:08:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 5⤋
people who connect the army are many times human beings from undesirable financial backgrounds. they many times purely have a extreme college commencement. wealthy human beings do no longer connect the army so because it is the reason the Bush daughters are actually not scuffling with in Iraq. it could additionally ought to with the undeniable fact that they do no longer opt to pass.
2016-10-14 12:24:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thank my lucky stars that I am not an American so do not have to answer this question. But we in Canada have lost lots of our young men also to this unneccessay war. And some of them due to friendly fire from our neighbours to the south. But these were accidental, but still young people lost their lives and parents their children. It would be a tough decision I am sure for lots of American parents especially if parents have been in the forces themselves. Another foolish war that cannot be won. Sounds like another one from about 40 years ago, what was it called again? Oh yeah Vietnam.
2006-09-09 07:11:42 · answer #3 · answered by crazylegs 7 · 12⤊ 2⤋
Regardless of who knew what, when and for whatever reason, my son has already gone to fight Bush's war. Ultimately, do we ever have the choice? If it was up to any parent, no ones son or daughter would ever have to go. Makes you wonder if Bush had a son if he would be subjected to the same standards the rest of our children are.
2006-09-09 07:10:06 · answer #4 · answered by curious 5 · 12⤊ 2⤋
I'm thankful that I don't have children to sacrifice. I don't know how those who object to the war can bear having their children fight an illegal war. I hate any injustice, so my heart does go out to them, but I also would not presume to know how they feel.
2006-09-09 07:10:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 4⤋
Hell No! Can you say CANADA?!!
How many of George Bush's children or the children of Congresional members are fighting "George Bush's"war?
2006-09-09 07:09:58 · answer #6 · answered by Barbara M 4 · 13⤊ 4⤋
When you decide to learn the facts and present them as such, not the liberal media's version of their own agenda, then you will recieve reasonable answers. America is at war on terrorism. America's soldiers are defending and defeating terrorism so attrocitites like the 9/11 bombing don't happen again.
The prior knowledge that Pres. Bush had about Bin Laden was that Bill Clinton let Bin Laden slide after he had the USS Cole blown open. Bill Clinton had 2 missles fired into a pile of tents in Afganistan and told the world that he destroyed Bin Laden. If Clinton had half the sense of a dead rat, he would have sent troops to get Bin Laden BEFORE he became so intrenched in his caves. Spin you way out of that, liberal
2006-09-09 07:18:01 · answer #7 · answered by dlobryan1 4 · 3⤊ 12⤋
no bcuz i wouldnt risk my childs life on that sucker bcuz he choose to go and make enemies for the world and i have this strange feeling he cheated his way in office any how i hope some one gets him out help me in that favor plz
2006-09-09 07:11:41 · answer #8 · answered by Chelsie W 2 · 11⤊ 3⤋
Bush is just an idiot for not remembering or saying he remembered various scenarios for terrorist attacks. You can't blame him personally for the entire fiasco. It's a failure that goes back to the 70's with the rise of Islamic theocracies in the Middle East, like Ayatollah in Iran, and the state of Israel. Who's Bush? Bush is just a pawn.
2006-09-09 07:10:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 8⤋
My son enlisted in the Army two years ago, with my approval.
I reject your assertion that Bush had prior knowledge. Now let me ask you this: If you were correct, and Bush knew in advance, wouldn't Clinton have known as well? There were years of planning and training after all that went into the attack, and it was Clinton who hired Richard Clark. If you're going to accuse Bush, then you have to accuse Clinto as well.
I am so sick of the Blame America First crowd. You're just a bunch of sniveling, unpatriotic cowards, without the intellectual capacity to recognize that there are enemies in the world that MUST be confronted. You deny reality because you cannot cope with it, and then you attack the very people who are protecting you. Maybe you have some kind of guilt complex because you live in a country that is prosperous and powerful. I've got news for you: Not all cultures are morally equivalent, and only an idiot would reject the American culture with it's rule of law, for one that kills innocent women and children, and advocates genocide.
2006-09-09 07:56:36 · answer #10 · answered by Jay S 5 · 3⤊ 12⤋