enforced, demanding illegal immigrants are deported, demanding our rights as citizens, voicing OUR outrage at the freedoms given to illegal people in our country?
What will happen if we don't? We will end up like South Africa (they had a European government that began about when the USA did):
A television program that aired in South Africa showed a town meeting somewhere in Southern California where people met to complain about falling standards in the schools. Whites who politely spoke at the meeting clearly resented the influx of Mexican immigrants into their community. When a handful of Chicanos at the back of the hall shouted and waved their hands at them, the whites simply shrunk back into their seats rather than tell the noisemakers to shut up. They didn't want to quarrel.
In America, the courts are still the final arbiters of society's laws. But what will happen when your future majority refuses to abide by court rulings - as in Zimbabwe?
2006-09-09 05:26:05 · 13 answers · asked by «»RUBY«» 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
What will happen when the new majority says the judges are racists, and that they refuse to acknowledge "white man's justice"? What will happen when the courts are filled with their people, or their sympathizers? In California, Proposition 187 has already been overturned.
What will you do when the future non-white majority decides to change the names of streets and cities? What will you do when they no longer want to use money that carries the portraits of old, dead white "racists" and slave owners? Will you cave in, like you did on flying the Confederate flag? What about the national anthem? Your official language?
Don't laugh. When the "majority" took over in South Africa, the first targets were our national symbols.
In another generation, America may well face what Africa is now experiencing - invasions of private land by the "have-nots;" the decline in health care quality; roads and buildings in disrepair: the banishment of your history from the education of the young;
2006-09-09 05:27:45 · update #1
the revolutionization of your justice system.
Don't imagine that government officials caught with their fingers in the till will be punished. Excuses - like the need to overcome generations of white racism - will be found to exonerate the guilty.
In fact, known criminals will be voted into office because of a racial solidarity among the majority that doesn't exist among the whites. When Ian Smith of the old Rhodesia tried to stand up to the world, white South African politicians were among the westerners pressuring him to surrender.
Your tax dollars will go to those who don't earn and don't pay. In South Africa organizations that used to have access to state funds such as old age homes, the arts, and veterans' services, are simply abandoned.
What will happen is that Western structures in America will be either destroyed from without, or transformed from within used to suit the goals of the new rulers. And they will reign either through terror as in Zimbabwe today or
2006-09-09 05:35:26 · update #2
To see this letter from a resident of South Africa, you must scroll down the page about 2/3 of the way down to "The Coming Darkness"
DO AMERICANS WANT THIS FOR THEIR FUTURE?? http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/HomeDoc.html#The%20America%20We%20Lost
2006-09-09 05:40:47 · update #3
(the first story is the The Goldwater Doctrine, that is NOT it, go on down the page 2/3 of the way down)
2006-09-09 05:42:30 · update #4
SORRY IT WAS SO LONG, I just had to get some of this letter on here. The people of Zimbabwe went through almost exactly what we are going through with these illegal immigrants. They changed laws, changed flags and long used symbols, erased/changed history from books, twisted laws to their favor. All because the European Government didn't want to be accused of 'racism' for upholding their laws, didn't want to quarrel against people who claimed laws were unfair (even though they were fair). Read it and weep!!
2006-09-09 06:12:15 · update #5
Now they have no medical programs in place, their elderly are not cared for, their veterans programs are gone, they are ruled by the people who twisted the laws, former criminals rule, anarchy rules.
2006-09-09 06:14:33 · update #6
The majority of Americans will prevail. Illegals do not stand a chance.
2006-09-09 05:33:56 · answer #1 · answered by the_wall 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Well, in South Africa, their problems were compounded by the practice of Apartheid, which basically meant there were 2 tiers of citizens, the whites and 'everybody else'. It was institutionalized racism, and while some rag on our country for that, it bears remembering that our country was very much AGAINST apartheid.
What we have today is much different. We have a situation where nations such as Mexico have been indulging in their favorite hobby of producing more mouths than their economy will support, and are now knocking on america's door for said support. If amnesty is allowed to pass, every single american taxpayer will effectively be paying 'child support'....for Mexico's children. How do YOU feel about that? I think, 'if you can't feed em, don't breed em', AKA 'responsibility'. I support the border fence, not because I don't think I could learn spanish, but because I think that it's fundamentally wrong to tolerate a massive influx of people.
Did you know that in the early 1900's, the global population was only about 1.2 billion? Today, that number is about 6.6 billion, and climbing annually at about 3% or so. So, do we take the kind road, and subject the United States to an Ultimate Makeover, and bring in about 3/4 of a billion people? Or, would a less 'pro-growth' stance on the whole issue be more in order?
For some, it's 'the more, the merrier'. For others, those who grew up being able to enjoy the wide open spaces, it looks closer to an invasion. There is also the question of what people will eat, what will they do for money, where will they find fresh water,
if 'help' means watching OUR country become a 2nd or 3rd world country, then there needs to be a different way of getting all this accomplished that doesn't involve subjecting the United States to eventual bankruptcy. I'm for regulated immigration, and legal immigration only, and the completion of the border fence.
Other countries have problems, that does not automatically make them OUR problems. We can help, just can't do it FOR em etc.
2006-09-09 05:46:05 · answer #2 · answered by gokart121 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Question was a little long. No we cant deport that many illegals. However we should never have allowed them here to begin with. If our borders were controlled years ago we would not have this problem. Second what I think is ironic. Is the people who come here illegally and when we start talking about blocking borders they protest and waive there flags around. If you respect your land so much go back their lol. We all need to face it. in parts of our country illegal immigrants take up a great portion of the population. We do not have the funds nor resources to ship them back. Second some of these people had children and raised them here. are we going to send them back aswell. I am not for illegal immigration these are just a few thoughts.
2006-09-09 05:53:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We need law enforcement at the Federal Level, which we will never get...sadly. Money & Money run this country now, with slavery abolished, "cheap" illegal labor is the new workforce of this country. Maybe I should start smoking pot, and claim I am from another country ;)
On another note, """ Will you cave in, like you did on flying the Confederate flag? """"
Maybe OTHER people caved, but my republic stood their ground, black and white!!! NOTE I say republic, because the term "state" is the business term used for a republic in the "union" . The Republic of Mississippi , held a statewide vote on whether to keep our flag. It stayed with 77% voting to keep it. Check the demographics for our state, and you will see, that we are VERY diverse.
2006-09-09 05:56:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
you had me at the question, but then completely lost me on the comment.
you see it will never happen, illegals will never rrun america, we are to much smarter then them in tactics. we dont need to run a protest of thousands, for the fact when we do get a protect we go millions just to make sure an american always has an american back.
our language will always be number 1 to mustly all americans, we will nto bow down there either, then you really screwed up when you brought up our national anthum, you have proven that illegals will never survive no matter how hard they try
they dont make htings better just try to sqeail there way out of everything else, like now that america is speaking out against them they hide.
2006-09-09 05:43:26 · answer #5 · answered by NoBama For Me 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
<< Why are human beings against Arizona's new immigration regulation? isn't it their maximum suitable to have this sort of regulation? >> easily it is no longer. The shape Article a million section 8 Clause 4 Empowers congress to enact "uniform" regulations on naturalization. What this skill is that the preliminary purpose of the form giving the flexibility entirely to congress became into to make certain that immigration rules won't have the ability to selection from state to state. This has been actual because of the fact the 1700's so no Arizona does not and by no skill has had the main suitable to pass this sort of regulation. << most of the state easily demanded the regulation be placed into result, human beings say it is profiling besides the fact that cops are constantly profiling whether we comprehend it or no longer, pulling over a below the impression of alcohol driving force for swerving is profiling for crying out loud, no person complains approximately that, properly different than below the impression of alcohol drivers. >> LOL! No, that may no longer profiling! yet this is a lovable way of a conservative attempting to make a factor. Profiling in reality skill police are harassing a individual by way of a prejudice of a secure charectoristic including race. << if a cop stops me he/she is authorized to invite for my I.D. how is it any distinctive for them to invite evidence of citizenship? >> A cop can no longer arrest you in any state in this united states of america for no longer showing him/her and identity. at the same time as you should respond to what your call is truthfully you won't have the ability to be arrested for no longer having an identity contemporary
2016-10-14 12:22:37 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will just drink beers and remember how great America used to be until the illegals of ALL backgrounds took over and whined till they get free healthcare, use our schools, now my Asian/American daughter will learn Spanish in school, instead of English. The next voting measure will be something like "California: Do we call it Mexifonia or North Tiajuana". We need to take back our country before it is too late.
2006-09-09 05:39:18 · answer #7 · answered by Fury 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The USA, nice? I'm sorry, I didn't read the rest of the question, I couldn't see for laughing.
Nothing against Americans, by the way, just foreign and domestic policy.
2006-09-09 05:28:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Your question is too long. All of you anti immigrant guys need to read some History and learn more about economics. Also you need to stop watching Lou Dobbs Tonight, that guy is just full of hate.
2006-09-09 05:33:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Stop whining. Why dont you tell that to the politicians that support undocumented immigrants. Maybe if you would stop whining so much and have better working ethics like undocumented immigrants do, then maybe employers would prefer "white" american working people.
STOP HR 4437!!
2006-09-09 05:44:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋