I have the Holy Bible to teach me truth. You have a science book.The science book never explains where the very first thing comes from.Now, lets see how smart you really are.
2006-09-09 03:49:34 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Evolution is a lie!!!
2006-09-09 03:51:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Science measures everything. It catalogs everything it can, and then tries to explain. The best theories work together and provide more explanations to other questions.
It used to be thought that all phenomena were divine. The stars were gods. The winds came from gods. Storms came from gods.
Science assumes otherwise... with the end result that you live in a society that has a basic understanding of how the universe really works. You have a computer, and probably a cellphone. That came from science and technology, not from the Bible.
Science WORKS. It FUNCTIONS. It does its utmost to deal in proof, but proof is not always instantly available. And at each stage, it is challenged relentlessly until the poorer theories have been winnowed away, and the better theories (we hope) remain.
If the Bible is correct and the universe originated 6,000 years ago, how can we see galaxies from billions of light-years away? The lightwaves must have been "created in transit," for the sole purpose of fooling us. Geological evidence was left too, just to fool us.
Or maybe Zeus created tigers and Athena created doves.
I'll stick with evolution. Yes, I believe in God. It's pretty clear He employed evolution. It's all around you.
As for the theory itself - it is VERY well thought out and documented. I'll let you do your own reading.
----
As for Intelligent Design... I wish people would just knuckle down and say creationist. These fumbling attempts to use the language of science to disprove science are inherently fallacious. There is no acceptance of creationism in the mainstream science community (which is and always will be international). None. And as far as science is concerned, that is the only court which counts. Sorry, folks.
2006-09-09 11:07:40 · answer #2 · answered by KALEL 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The fact of this matter is: Neither Creation nor Evolution are even SCIENTIFIC THEORIES. Neither have the possibility of being tested (required for forming scientific theories). They are BOTH scientific MODELS.
Lists of progression are charted, then attributed either to Evolution or Creation. They are then compared, based on PHYSICAL evidence & laboratory experiments.
A few conclusions:
1) Proteins cannot naturally duplicate into proteins,
2) Sugars cannot naturally duplicate into sugars,
3) the probability of DNA replicating itself is 1/ several billion chances,
4) oxygen destroys complex chemical reactions, yet is essential to life & is evidenced in Pre-Cambrian rock sediment,
5) there are NO transitional form fossils,
6) all proported "evidences" of the "ape to man" evolution have been proven false (Neanderthal Man, Piltdown Man, etc), even though they are still included as "evidence" in most biology books,
7) the 2 LAWS of Thermodynamics refute the possibility of evolution occuring.
There are more, but these should at least give pause to an unyeilding belief of Evolution..
2006-09-09 11:50:57 · answer #3 · answered by azar_and_bath 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Time is the evolutionist's magic wand. You wave the wand and the know universe appears. You wave the wand and countless life forms appear on a random planet orbiting an insignificant star.
They say that given enough time, anything can happen. If so, I should be able to drop a deck of playing cards from an airplane and they wil fall to earth in order. Not enough time? Lets drop that deck of cards from the space shuttle and see if the cards land in order. Didn't happen? Gee, maybe there wasnt enough time to allow for order to come from the chaos of dumping 52 cards into the atmosphere.
Evolution is just like that. Children say that if a princess kisses a frog she will get a prince. Evolutionists believe that if you take chemicals and wave the magic wand of time you get the known universe.
2006-09-09 10:57:55 · answer #4 · answered by TubeDude 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Our best guess is that the first life form came into existence through a chemical reaction between complex but nonliving molecules. It may have been initiated by ultraviolet striking the Earth's surface or perhaps a stroke of lightning. It had a very small chance of happening with any given molecules, fo course, but there were enough molecules all over the surface of the Earth and enough time that eventually it happened. At any rate, the earliest life forms would have been extremely simple, simpler than most modern viruses (which are themselves very simple compared to cells), and only evolved to be more complex later on.
2006-09-09 10:52:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
i LOVE the fact that every evolutionist loves to "side with science", but dont even know what they believe
buh buh teh bible is old!!!!111
yep. scientists can change their theory all they want to when theres a mistake, which theyve done many, many times. but has the bible ever been changed?? NO!!!
lol, evolutionists are silly, thank you for asking this question
and the fossil record doesnt even support evolution. we have yet to find a true, known intermediate stage. archyopteryx could have been one, but we need a heck of a lot more animals than 2 to form a valid answer.
2006-09-09 10:57:30 · answer #6 · answered by stevo 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
By the first thing I presume that you mean living thing as evolution is not an explanation of the big bang.
So as particles and atoms started combining with each other as the earth developed they started to form more and more complex organic (carbon based compounds) and these are what formed the basis of life on earth. So life came from non life. The abilty to produce new life (DNA) is a chemical compound
Also to the people who don't understand why monkeys are still around ...
humans and monkeys are both from a shared ancestor that is probably no longer around. We evolved differently as we migrated to different areas of the earth and as we were seperated by time and geography.
Thats why in some areas you have gorillas, others you have orang utangs other areas have macaws. They have each developed in their own environment.
Noone said humans came from monkeys apart from creationists misquoting Darwin.
2006-09-09 10:53:37 · answer #7 · answered by Bebe 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Evolutionists will try to tell you that life came from non life which is an absolute impossibility.
Take a rock and turn it into a frog and maybe I'll believe. If the very first thing was gasses, or atoms or whatever, how did the big bang produce life from that.
2006-09-09 10:54:01 · answer #8 · answered by mel 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think I can. 700 million trillion years ago.nothing exploded into everything.then another trillion zillion years went by and lightning hit some algae on a rock and WHAMMO! "Life as we know it" Every single living bird,fish,reptile,roach,beetle, etc,etc (and human) came from the goo on the rock being struck by lightning.That and that it took trillions of billions of years.It somehow makes it sound plausible to evolutionists if we say it took a very long time and use big scientific sounding words.I don't have enough faith to believe in evolution myself (or the changes they make every few weeks) and choose to trust in the old tried and true standard>the Bible
2006-09-09 10:52:08 · answer #9 · answered by Mr Toooo Sexy 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yep, Darwin.
Can anyone truly explain the Bible?
2006-09-09 10:51:50 · answer #10 · answered by big-brother 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
My lack of a ready provable answer in no way implies that 'god did it by magic' is a good answer.
Your answer is just made up crap ignorant bronze aged bedouine wrote down.
'no one knows' is the right answer, even though we have some decent hypotheses about how it could have happened. We might never know how it actually happened.
2006-09-09 10:53:16 · answer #11 · answered by lenny 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋