The famous historian Shri P.N. Oak has proven that Taj Mahal is actually Tejo Mahalaya-- a shiv temple-palace. His work was published in 1965 in the book, Taj Mahal - The True Story. However, we have not heard much about it because it was banned by Congress government of Bharat.
After reading Shri Oak's work which provides more than adequate evidence to prove that Taj Mahal is indeed Tejo Mahalaya, one has to wonder if the government of Bharat has been full of traitors for the past 50 years! Because to ban such a book which states only the truth is surely a crime against our great nation of Bharat.
The most valuable evidence of all that Tejo Mahalaya is not an Islamic building is in the Badshahnama which contains the history of the first twenty years of Shah Jahan's reign. The writer Abdul Hamid has stated that Taj Mahal is a temple-palace taken from Jaipur's Maharaja Jaisingh.
Source:
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate/tejo.html
2006-09-08 17:42:45 · 7 answers · asked by Akash 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Well India is the only country in the World where Majority lives at the mercy of the minority and to appease the muslims ,we forgo all our valuable temple ,destroy any evidences that these were temples ,you name a structure made by a muslim king randomly in India or a Mosque ,ask an independent internatial archealogists work on it and alas you find every structure has a hindu temple or a place of prominance destroyed or refabricated or semibuilt as is in the cases of ayodhya,mathura and tejomahalaya .we accept all the stories narrated to us Marxist historians put in place by congress govts to destroy the word hindu and hinduism ,just for cheap vote bank pollitics.
2006-09-09 04:56:02 · answer #1 · answered by aathrey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't read the article fully but the very fact that it has been made in Mughal style of architecture speaks 4 itself.I wouldn't wish to comment anymore.
MARISSA, I'm sorry 4 the fowl language I used.I was really put-off by the debate on Vande Mataram.While some Muslims were singing it with full enthusiasm, what was the problem with others? They didn't want 2 say "vande' which means "I bow 2 thee". When u said it was incomplete & Hindu goddesses were praised, I got even more furious since only those parts pats r sung in which India is praised.
I know that doesn't justify my act. So I beg ur pardon once again.
1 more thing, again u commented on the Babri issue without knowing the details.A Hindu temple was 1st built there which was destroyed by Muslim invaders who,in turn, built a mosque there. Now tell me, WHOSE MISTAKE IS IT? Hindu fanatics might b thr but they aren't as violent & notorious as Islamist extrememists. Plus they don't bomb others or ask others 2 convert.I hope u don't take offence 4 this as this is a fact.
EDIT: I just finished reading the article.Well, what can I say. I has really made me think.The points mentioned thr rn't refutable at all. It can/may be true. The ASI should investigate it further.It shudn't bother the Muslims. Afterall, only the truth is being investigated. This matter surely needs attention.V need 2 know the truth.
2006-09-09 06:56:43 · answer #2 · answered by whatever 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
History proves it was built by Shah Jahan for his wife Noor Jahan. Nothing can change that.
2006-09-09 00:58:46 · answer #3 · answered by NchantingPrincess 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It figures, if the muslims made anything that nice it would have already been blown up.
2006-09-09 00:45:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
ya ok claim it or destroy it just like Babri masjid.
and the world thought that only muslims were fanatics..........
2006-09-09 00:53:13 · answer #5 · answered by marissa 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
crap, even if they were true, its still crap....i dont substantiate demolision of Ayodhya.
Its promoting separatism , even your damned question
2006-09-09 01:09:14 · answer #6 · answered by sree 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Thanks for the information. very useful.
2006-09-09 00:51:48 · answer #7 · answered by mspentinum 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋