everyone knows they have found wmds in iraq, and he even used them on his own people< why can't democra

Question

democrats understand this, it was proven that he was pursuing even more dangerous weapons, the world is safer with hussein and his sons out of power.

Answer 1

If you want to believe that, go right ahead.

Answer 2

Did Saddam have WMDs, yes he did especially Chemical which we knew prior to the first Bush's war. Let me ask you a question, how many countries DO NOT have some type of WMD? Seriously, most do, not necessarily nukes but definitely chemical or biological. Search for it.

As for the world being safer without Saddam, true as well. Would the world be safer if some of the African dictators aren't in power, yes. If the nations of the world agreed more, yes to that as well. The problem with taking Saddam out as we found out is that, he was not worth the price we had to pay to do so, that's why we let him STAY the first time. Sometimes when you try to fix a small problem, which is what is was you create a bigger one, which is what we have now.

Answer 3

To the dumb neocon All WMD's were destroyed by 1991. The WMD's you seen fox propaganda network all 12 or so shells are left overs found from old battlefields not some huge warehouse as even fox has admitted. The shells were mustard rounds so old as to be worthless and classified as toxic waste and disposed of. constantly pushing this lie will not fly any more the public is on to it now. As for the world being safer with Saddam out of power tell it to the 2,600+ soldiers dead and the 20,000 maimed the tens of thousands of Iraqi's killed and maimed and a beautiful civil war terrorist on every street when there were none before oh yeah things are soooo much better what a freak in moron.

Answer 4

Everyone knows this? You better tell the President because he just announced that there were no WMD's in Iraq. The CIA denies any WMD's. All these people who know about the WMD's should really tell the ones who don't, the White house, the CIA, the NSA etc. While doing that tell them about the Iraqi involvement in 9/11. They are under the impression that Iraq didn't have anything to do with it. Go figure, with all the intelligence organizations available to them they don't know what you know. Aren't you the proudest average American alive? Who says that the average American has an IQ that would shame a brick?

Answer 5

Who are your sources? Some extreme right conservatives? Open up your eyes! Is the world really a safer place with Saddam in jail. Last I checked, Saddam didn't have anything to do with the terrorist plot caught in London. Also, please explain how is the world a safer place now Saddam is gone? There's civil war going on in Africa. Iran is talking about building an atom bomb. Many countries are still in poverty. Many people from Louisiana are still homeless a year after Katrina. So, how does the war in Iraq and getting rid of Saddam make the world a better place?

Answer 6

Perhaps you should take some time off this site and read some real newspapers. You'd learn that only old nonviable WMDs were found -- no viable WMDs were found in Iraq. You and Rich Sanatorium have an odd dance going. You are bound to find some who will verify whatever it is you want to believe here but reading and learning might expand your horizons and your outlook.

Answer 7

There were no weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq after the invasion. Even President Bush has admitted this fact. The incident of "used against his own people", refers to poison gas used by Husein over 15 years ago, soon after Operation Desert Storm when George Walker Bush was President of the US and pulled out of Iraq leaving the Kurds in the north of Iraq without air cover and in revolt against Husein. Not even poison gas was found after the present invasion .

Answer 8

Foxnews links do no longer count quantity. whilst will you already know that foxnews is considered as enormously biased and professional-Bush. are you able to stumble on a single foxnews hyperlink criticizing Bush ever? NONE. Foxnews = 0 Credibility by way of its love for Bush. additionally the different source, owned with the help of a conservative getting used as hyperlink, does not count quantity the two. we could like independent independent links with the help of companies that do honest reporting. like those that the two criticize and compliment Bush at cases. Foxnews links are as good to a individual like a plagiarized learn paper is to a professsor.

Answer 9

It's not about the WMD's. We all know that he had them and was going to use them. The Idiotic left just has to spew there rhetoric to make themselves feel better. We are not fooled though.

Answer 10

They are retarded.Besides, I am pretty sure the WMD's were supposed to be top secret information and that's why not many civilians have heard about this.

Answer 11

Same reason they don't want ABC to air this special about 9/11 because they will have to admit that all this is Clifton's fault and he left the mess for Bush to clean up,and plus with the elections coming up soon,it might look bad on HILLERY............because I say she will run