One: I have to do my military service for the next one year.
Two: I have to do my military service for the next year.
2006-09-08 16:03:49 · 25 answers · asked by immonen33 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Languages
"I have to do my military service for the next one year" = I have to do my miltiary servive until September 8, 2007.
"I have to do my miltary service for the next year" = I have to do my military service from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007."
And those are not the same statments.
2006-09-08 16:32:26 · answer #1 · answered by urbancoyote 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No,with the aid of fact one refers to difficulty without being spoke of till now,yet another in a particular context in opposite. as a result ,grammar is a stable gadget to objective if the sentence is as comparable as yet another sentence.
2016-11-06 22:44:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but they are both wrong. You should say,i have to do my military service for another year.
2006-09-08 16:17:30 · answer #3 · answered by rosieC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only one is correct #2. The first is wrong because it says for the next one year. It repeatable, one can understand that for the next year means one.
2006-09-08 16:13:01 · answer #4 · answered by Boricua Born 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Same.
In English when speaking in reference to time, not citing the numeric time means the time defaults to one unit.
"I'll be there in a minute." same as "I'll be there in one minute."
As my 17 year old daughter points out on a regular basis - "This is America! We speak English! We use figurative language!"
Peace!
or from right to left: Shalom!
2006-09-08 16:13:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep, the only difference is is that the first sentence is said incorrectly. The word 'one' is extra and is confusing to the reader.
2006-09-08 16:05:56 · answer #6 · answered by winds_of_justice 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes they are the same but the 2 sentence is better than the first.
2006-09-08 16:08:33 · answer #7 · answered by hopelane 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Number two sounds better. I do not think the first sentence is grammatical correct and does not sound right.
2006-09-08 16:07:07 · answer #8 · answered by ALBPACE 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes but the second one is less confusing and more efficient
2006-09-08 16:05:08 · answer #9 · answered by Aint No Bugs On Me 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, because the first one has an extra word, but they have the same sense, except id go with the second one, its shorter
2006-09-08 16:10:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋