English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-08 14:20:23 · 14 answers · asked by ronnieguyoncam 1 in Politics & Government Military

i saw a few answers, and heres what comes to mind. the guys feel it was the right thing to do cause 'might is right'. the ladies do feel differently. i'm not US bashing at all..... just wanna know opinions. most guys would say.... who cares ! well..... thats ur opinion. very interesting. thank u nevertheless.

2006-09-08 22:11:56 · update #1

14 answers

there is a much larger picture then the average person sees. But I will say this, not unlike any other country, the USA does do whats in its best interest. The USA also stands up for those who can't and that is one of many things I love about this country. Only if we could get the politicians on both sides to grow up we just might work things out. one thing for sure, there are groups out there who want to kill non-Muslim people and even Muslims who don't believe exactly as they do. these people must be confronted, and those who would arm them.

2006-09-08 14:29:34 · answer #1 · answered by Work In Progress 3 · 1 2

I am afraid that we will face the fact, that there were no reasons at all as Mr Saddam was not involved in Al Qaida or supported them. What he had done should be taken care of by the International Court in Haag. On the other hand, there are good reasons to be looking for supporters of Al Qaida within Saudi Arabia and that the real hatred comes from there.

2006-09-08 14:43:27 · answer #2 · answered by Realname: Robert Siikiniemi 4 · 2 0

The only rights involved are the ones a country chooses to claim by force. There is no universal over-arching international law that governs all conduct between nations.

The closest we have are treaties, which are basically contracts. And if the US decides to breach the contract, and ignore the treaty, who has enough force (and willing to use it) to stop them?

Might makes right. That's the nature of the world. Love it or leave it.
Or fix it.

2006-09-08 14:32:45 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1 0

It is essential for a superpower to intervene in weaker countries. It is the survival of the fittest. If we, the US do not, we will become another Mexico, which hides behind their old saying that says "el respeto al derecho ageno es la paz." Or if "we respect other people's rights we will be in peace." We cannot be in peace to preserve our superpower status. I don't care how much people cry on this board, we will continue intervening for the sake of greateness. I love these U.S. of A. and nobody will ever take that away from me! I am a proud American! I just regret that I only have one life to give in defense of my country. It is not acting beyond its rights. Count me plus 1.

2006-09-08 14:32:22 · answer #4 · answered by Morgan 3 · 1 1

because of the fact Obama hates united states of america of america. He additionally desires to alter united states of america of america right into a banana republic. i'm saying this yet i'm particular, in his own recommendations, he does not think of of it this form. He hates capitalism because of the fact he sees it as growing to be inequality between the folk who stay in this united states. He thinks that capitalism is what's conserving down the undesirable and allowing some human beings to alter into obscenely wealthy. He does not understand that it is the "obscenely wealthy" that are writing the paychecks for people who're keen to artwork to assist their families and themselves. no person must be undesirable yet there'll continuously be the lazy, the incompetent, the loopy, addicts, and others who can not or won't artwork. He hates the form (i'm particular he does not sense that he does) because of the fact he's conscious of this is the mechanism that has allowed united states of america of america to alter into the super and wealthy united states that this is. He sees it as allowing the grasping and wealthy to subjugate people who haven't any money or power. He trolls for choose among the elite of the worldwide because of the fact he thinks that they instruct a thank you to authentic egalitarianism. (i'm particular that there is a private opt to be regarded as super approximately this too.) Obama won't understand the destruction he's wrecking upon this united states till this is basically too previous due--or he, being so wrapped up in his own ego and insouciance, won't in any respect see it. notwithstanding, this united states is going to get replaced invariably. The financial gadget will fall apart, company will come decrease than the purvue of the federal government completely (fascism), and human beings would be divested of all the comforts and rights that they've come to anticipate. Or it could basically be that united states of america of america will substitute into so susceptible that some foreign places power will see it because of the fact the appropriate possibility to break us fully. you will ought to be certain this is the kinder end for this as quickly as-super united states.

2016-12-18 07:11:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I do, the world thought we shouldnt invade iraq, except Blair. We did and we found out the government lied to us. I think Bush should be required to go to jail along with condi and kay bailey hutchinson. All crooked as sadaam.

2006-09-08 14:43:09 · answer #6 · answered by circusdejojo 3 · 2 1

I do!

Its sad while we are all over the world fixing other contries problems, our country is falling apart...... no body seems to care or take notice.

2006-09-08 15:39:08 · answer #7 · answered by Krazee about my pets! 4 · 0 0

I do. It's lining the pockets of the military-industrial complex at American taxpayer expense.

2006-09-08 15:05:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Who gives a f@#$?..Were the strongest country in the world and are allied w/ any of the runner ups..Besides the f@#$ing Commies..Whos gunna stop us?

2006-09-08 14:52:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

This question in a variety of forms has been asked many times previously. I believe we were within our rights to go into Iraq.

2006-09-08 14:23:13 · answer #10 · answered by EW 4 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers