I believe What makes HUMAN a human is swimming in those realms... .but my question is.Will there be a point in humanity where we(as a race) realise that science and relgion are 2 extremes with one goal?
2006-09-08 12:42:07 · 11 answers · asked by vJ 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Philosophy is not religion.
Science and philosphy have already merged,
the result is psychology.
2006-09-08 12:46:05 · answer #1 · answered by Bob L 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is not, and never has been a conflict between religion and science, the conflict is between science and the people who use religion as a tool for financial gain and secular power. That gap can never be closed because it would require the clergy to get real jobs.
2006-09-08 12:49:47 · answer #2 · answered by rich k 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Religion is constantly being backed up by scientific discoveries. The question is, will there ever be enough evidence and proof in the face of skeptics to make them believe that the 2 are actually1? My answer is no.
2006-09-08 12:48:46 · answer #3 · answered by Celestian Vega 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
True science (not clouded by personality or prejudice), and faith in God are not at odds. Western science was once dominated by men movitivated by a desire to know more of God's creation.
2006-09-08 12:51:51 · answer #4 · answered by edward_lmb 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science and religion have met, it's called Intelligent Design.
2006-09-08 12:50:06 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
science .. philosophy .. religion
those are the 3 principles of my faith ( spiritualism ) and yes i truly believe that they are trying to reach for the same goal
and doing so rather well in some areas
http://www.snu.org.uk/spirit.htm
2006-09-08 12:50:07 · answer #6 · answered by Peace 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sorry Science and philosophy are what man thinks about.Religion is what man believes.Christ is the only real answer .The book that GOD transcribed will answer all the other questions.
2006-09-08 12:51:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Who are we? The answer to this question is not only one of the tasks but *the* task of science." -Erwin Schrödinger, Science and Humanism, 1953
2006-09-08 12:46:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As many of the answerers talk about, there is various mystical luggage given to QM that would not truly belong there. What QM is sturdy at, is pointing out the limitations in ANY formula lets make of the international, to the very aspect of conceptually attainable measurements. Demonstrating scientifically the end results of the contemplative practice is what the Santa Barbara Institute for knowledge study does. playstation . i'll allow you to know from the reaction to a previous question of mine that the persons who imagine technology and faith attempt to describe an analogous issues are uncommon on R&S.
2016-11-25 21:17:39 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I already believe that to be true. we see signs of it happening today that science points to God
2006-09-08 12:47:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋