English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Wouldn't that make mincemeat of the standard definitions of the words?

2006-09-08 11:43:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

No because if someone believes in any god they cannot, by definition be an atheist. Likewise for the theists.

2006-09-08 18:43:56 · answer #2 · answered by boukenger 4 · 1 0

If they believed in god, they wouldn't be an atheist. The theist would be atheist if they didn't believe in god.

2006-09-08 18:43:17 · answer #3 · answered by i luv teh fishes 7 · 2 0

I was atheist and now I learn God was with me. Atheism doesnt mean always to be a bad or immoral person, is just another view of religion. I had great experiencies in religion.

2006-09-08 18:44:05 · answer #4 · answered by frankomty 3 · 2 0

The latter one violates the definition; however, an atheist can believe in god but not a personal, theistic one.

2006-09-08 18:50:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Is Alice in Wonderland Is the wizard in OZ

2006-09-10 22:23:20 · answer #6 · answered by ??IMAGINE ?? 5 · 0 0

The whole thing about athiests is they DON'T believe in God. If they did, they wouldn't be athiest.

2006-09-08 18:45:04 · answer #7 · answered by creeklops 5 · 0 0

That makes as much sense as thinking of a light black.

2006-09-08 18:44:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i dont really know. if god suddenly shows up then hey!! ill believe it. if god DOES exsist then way to go for you you have followers!!

2006-09-08 18:42:59 · answer #9 · answered by Invader Zim 2 · 0 0

By definition, both of those terms are mutually exclusive.

2006-09-08 18:47:59 · answer #10 · answered by Jack P 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers