Yes that is accurate as measured in 1992.
But it isn't in the top 100 worldwide. It's about 127th and 2,900 meters short of number 1. It is Number 2 in North America.
It isn't NWT, it is in the Yukon Territory.
2006-09-08 15:22:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by JuanB 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Mount Logan massif is considered to contain all the surrounding peaks with less than 500 m of prominence, as listed below:
Peak metres feet Latitude (N) Longitude (W)
Main 5,959 19,550 60°34′02″ 140°24′10″
Philippe Peak (West) 5,925 19,439 60°34′45″ 140°25′56″
Stuart Peak (East) 5,900 19,357 60°34′32″ 140°21′55″
Houston's Peak 5,720 18,766 60°35′06″ 140°27′13″
Prospector Peak 5,644 18,517
AINA Peak 5,630 18,471
Russell Peak 5,570 18,274 60°35′35″ 140°28′02″
Tudor Peak (North) 5,559 18,238 60°36′59″ 140°25′56″
Saxon Peak (Northeast) 5,490 18,012 60°36′59″ 140°29′28″
Queen Peak 5,380 17,651
Capet Peak (Northwest) 5,280 17,323
Catenary Peak 4,097 13,442
Teddy Peak 3,956 12,979
2006-09-08 18:23:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by fresh2 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Main 5,959 19,550 60°34′02″ 140°24′10″
2006-09-08 18:22:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wrong it is in the Yukon and 5959 is the Marker it is higher in winter due to snow cover
Not the Rockies but the Alaska/Yukon Ranges - Hummingbird Ridge
2006-09-09 02:39:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by JD 2
·
0⤊
0⤋