how many of you believe in the death penality? explain. what about the gay and lezbian marriage law. i think it is ok because nothing is wrong with that. they cant help it. they will live together anyway. if they are going to pass that law they should pass a law that if you get pregnant before you are 21, they have to terminate the pregnancy.
2006-09-08 11:12:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
I don't believe in the death penalty because no human should decide anyone's death besides God. And the world is imperfect, if someone wants to be married to the same sex than there isn't anything stopping them until death separates the two.
2006-09-08 11:27:25 · answer #1 · answered by Reighn J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't like the idea of the death penalty. One reason is that the Bush Bros. favor it. When you see women and young children sexually assaulted and murdered it is hard to oppose the death penalty. Locking them away in a place like Pelican Bay State prison in CA makes them spend the rest of their lives thinking about what they did. I would lock them up with no more than a Bible to read. Pelican Bay by the way is a super max place in northern CA, about 5 miles south off the Oregon border. I have gay friends, they live together, if they want to marry let them. The ones I know get along better than normally married couples. In the Biblical sense though it is wrong.
2006-09-08 11:27:10 · answer #2 · answered by Thomas S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From where do you get your ideas? Your question can be frightening. I believe in the death penalty. It is good when applied correctly. "Gay" marriage is wrong. There is nothing bright or colorful about such a life-style. What law are you referring to in the last part of your question? What sense does it make to abort the children, pregnancies, of women under that age of 21? Your question, comment, invites criticism at best. I refrain from the worst.
2006-09-08 11:27:37 · answer #3 · answered by Jack 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, to death penalty - my brother was murdered by a habitual criminal while buying milk for his children. Some people are dangerous & not worth feeding & babysitting for life.
Gay marriages - make any private commitment you want but marriage has always been between man & woman & there have always been gay people. no need to change.
Abortion - you can not require someone to murder a baby because you have an issue with their age. You may not feel it is murder but it does not mean they do not. My first child was born after I was married for 20 months but I was only 19 - a month from 20. She is a college graduate, mother of 3 & community leader - why would you want to murder her.
2006-09-08 11:22:53 · answer #4 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very exciting question- you're genuinely proper to assert that there is not any longer something else that persons use the pro-determination argument except even as it comprises abortion. And basically because a toddler contained in the womb isn't totally more suitable , there is each thing there - even at 3 weeks after idea there's a coronary heart beat. seem at images of little ones contained in the womb= they're little ones. And yet another professional-determination (abortion) argument is that the toddler contained in the womb isn't alive till it may stay with the help of itself- what if that toddler replaced into born upfront and had to be on an incubator- and the ladies persons "chosen" that she didn't wish the youngster then, and keen to "take" a existence then- she might want to be up for homicide- a toddler , even even as wholesome can't live to inform the tale it truly is own with out the help of the moms and dads- so shouldn't you be professional-determination there too? for sure no longer- the accountable desires to be punished (demise penalty) an threat free toddler desires to stay. thanks for this question.
2016-11-25 21:10:59 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if someone has been tried for murder and there is 100% no doubt that they are guilty and they took the other persons life on purpose, i say YES to the death penalty, a life for a life, the other person had no choice in being murdered, so death to the murderer, if it was an accident, say their car skidded and they killed someone by accident, they shouldn't even be jailed if the accident was through no fault of their own.
to gay and lesbian marriages, i am not a lesbian but for those that are gay, their love is no different to a straight persons, it doesn't affect my life in the slightest so it doesn't bother me at all. love is love as far as i can see.
2006-09-08 11:24:41 · answer #6 · answered by Summer Rain 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
death penalty is sometimes not good enough for the crimes people commit, gay marriage, why not, let everyone in the world deal with with the reality of marriage and the pregnancy thing...c'mon now...thats dumb, it wouldn't stop the 13 year olds doing it...
2006-09-08 11:18:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
the death penalty in some cases,, gay rights,, the VP's daughter deserves no less rights than any other American citizen,,,,
2006-09-08 11:15:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
death penality, i dont know about. gay and lez. marriages, i agree 100%. about the pregency thing. . . i dont know if that will happen anytime soon. it sounds a little harsh.
2006-09-08 11:18:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Im for the Death pentaly and I am for Gays being married.....the rest of your question is just plain stupid.
2006-09-08 11:17:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋