particularly, i mean executive outcomes, why did the UN pay them to keep control of rwanda after their contract was up. from my knowlegde the mercenary company executive outcomes came into rwanda stopped the genocide at hand for relatively cheap and extremely more effectively, but as thier contract was up the UN wanted them out so they could continue the operations. and of course because the UN is retarded it f*%k it up
2006-09-08 07:39:09 · 3 answers · asked by lots_of_pie 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I suppose there's always a problem with abuse of such a group... we can particularly think about terrorists. But what happens when college students start protesting? If clear lines were drawn, we might actually benefit by such a move.
2006-09-08 11:45:08 · answer #1 · answered by Mike S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are issues that I cannot discuss dealing with " Privatized" military . At this very moment , there are black ops at work all over the world , that is all I dare say .When I was in Mogadishu attached to the 10th mountain , ( Oct '93 ) we lost 19 good men , & 2 blackhawks . We had to run from where we had been trapped over that long night , several blocks . The UN personell carriers refused to let us ride , they drove ahead , providing no cover fire , we barely made it back to the soccer stadium . On their vehicles they have the 2 letters : U & N , which stand for UNco-oporative ...God bless our home & save us from this destructive administration .Soon , we may not be able to speak freely , so speak now , or forever be silenced by our government .
2006-09-08 08:06:28 · answer #2 · answered by Fair Warning 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no cons to it.....There are only politicians.
2006-09-08 08:00:33 · answer #3 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋